PRA Decides to Maintain O-SII Buffers for Another Year
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023. This decision is relevant only to the ring-fenced banks and large building societies that will be subject to the O-SII buffer. The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA took this decision in response to the economic shock from COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, FPC published a report that complements its financial stability report and sets out its views on key financial stability issues in UK. The report accompanies a summary and record of the FPC meeting that was held on September 23, 2021, with the next policy meeting of FPC expected to be in November 2021.
As stated in the meeting record, FPC expects banks to use all elements of their capital buffers, as needed, to support the economy through recovery. To support bank lending to households and businesses as the economy recovers, FPC is maintaining the UK Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB) rate at 0%. FPC has previously stated that it expects to maintain a 0% UK CCyB until at least December 2021. In line with the standard implementation period, any subsequent increase would not be expected to take effect until the end of 2022 at the earliest. FPC will also consult on a proposal to change the metric used to determine O-SII buffer rates to exclude central bank reserves, effective from the 2023 PRA assessment of individual firm buffer rates. FPC also welcomes the intention of PRA to continue to freeze O-SII buffer rates until that point.
An initiative that FPC already has in place is the Recommendations to limit a deterioration in the mortgage underwriting standards or a rapid build-up in the share of highly indebted households. FPC observes that the corporate debt vulnerabilities in UK have increased moderately during the pandemic and is due to finalize its review of the calibration of its mortgage market Recommendations in December 2021. The BoE communication also highlights the continued growth in cryptoassets and the associated markets and services, despite which such assets are still believed to represent limited direct risks to the stability of the financial system in UK. However, regulatory and law enforcement frameworks, both domestically and at a global level, need to keep pace with developments in these fast-growing markets to manage risks and maintain trust and integrity in the financial system. In the policy meeting statement, FPC also emphasizes that market participants should use the most robust alternative benchmarks available in transitioning away from use of LIBOR to minimize future risks to financial stability.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, O-SII, Regulatory Capital, Basel, COVID-19, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, CCyB, Cryptoassets, LIBOR, Interest Rate Benchmarks, FPC, PRA
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticlePRA and FPC Finalize Changes to Leverage Ratio Framework in UK
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.