EC welcomed the political agreement reached by European Parliament and EU member states to ensure a more robust and effective supervision of central counterparties (CCPs) offering services in EU. The Presidency and the Parliament reached a provisional agreement on how EU and third-country clearing houses should be supervised in the future, considering the effects of Brexit on the European financial system. The new rules will be implemented through a revision of European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and a revision of the statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and ECB.
The reform is intended to strengthen CCP considering the growing size, complexity, and cross-border dimension of clearing in Europe. The agreed text establishes a CCP supervisory committee in ESMA; the committee will be composed of an independent Chair, competent authorities of member states with an authorized CCP, and two independent members. The text also strengthens the existing system for recognizing and supervising third-country clearing houses. It introduces a "two tier" system differentiating between non-systemically important CCPs and systemically important CCPs. To be recognized and authorized to operate in the EU, the tier 2 CCPs would be subject to stricter rules, including the following:
- Compliance with the necessary prudential requirements for EU-CCPs while taking into account third-country rules
- Confirmation from the relevant EU central banks that the CCP complies with any additional requirements set by those central banks
- Agreement of a CCP to provide ESMA with all relevant information and to enable on-site inspections, in addition to the necessary safeguards confirming that such arrangements are valid in the third country
On the basis of a fully reasoned assessment, ESMA would also be able to recommend that a CCP or some of its clearing services are of such substantial systemic importance that the CCP should not be recognized. EC could decide, as a measure of last resort, that CCP will need to establish itself in EU. At present, 16 CCPs are established and authorized in the EU. Additional 32 third-country CCPs have been recognized under the equivalence provisions of EMIR, allowing these CCPs to offer services in EU. Following Brexit, three CCPs based in UK will de facto become third-country CCPs. Further technical work will follow this political agreement before the European Parliament and the Council can formally adopt the final text.
- Press Release by EC
- Press Release by European Council
- Text on EMIR Review (PDF)
- Text on Revision of ECB Statute (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, CCPs, EMIR, Brexit, Tier 2 CCPs, Systemic Risk, European Parliament, European Council, ESMA, ECB, EC
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes Data Quality Checks for Bank Reporting
APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals.
ESAs (EBA, EIOPA, and ESMA) published the first joint report that assesses risks in the financial sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BoE and HM Treasury confirmed that the COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) will close for new purchases of commercial paper, with effect from March 23, 2021.
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
EC adopted a decision determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties, or CCPs, in the UK and Northern Ireland is equivalent to the requirements laid down in the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR or Regulation 648/2012).
EBA has decided to phase out the guidelines on legislative and non-legislative moratoria of loan repayments, in accordance with the earlier specified end of September deadline.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.