EBA and ESRB have published their opinion, following a notification by the Central Bank of Estonia (Eesti Pank) to extend a measure to impose a credit institution-specific minimum level of 15% for the exposure-weighted average of the risk-weights applied to the portfolio of retail exposures secured by mortgages on immovable property to obligors residing in Estonia. The measure applies to credit institutions that use the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for calculating regulatory capital requirements. The Central Bank of Estonia intends to extend the measure to ensure that banks hold sufficient own funds to cover systemic risks related to housing loans and to act as a backstop limiting any further decrease in risk-weights. Based on the evidence submitted, EBA does not object to the extension of the proposed measure, which will be applied for two years. ESRB also opines that the extension of the period of application of the existing stricter national measure applicable in Estonia has been assessed as justified, suitable, proportionate, effective, and efficient.
In its opinion, EBA acknowledged the concerns of Eesti Pank over the build-up of risks in the residential real estate sector, the risk stemming from the macroeconomic environment, and the high concentration of IRB banks in the housing loan market in the country. EBA reiterates its support for measures that strengthen the resilience of the banking sector against negative macroeconomic shocks. At this juncture, Eesti Pank projects a slight overvaluation in the housing market and has issued communications about tightening of requirements for issuing housing loans. Nevertheless, Eesti Pank does not see a bubble in the housing market. Going forward, expectations of further house price increases are also supported by elevated household savings and changes in the second pillar of the pension system, which allow households to withdraw pension savings. These funds, when available starting from September 2021, could be channeled to the housing market, leading to larger down-payments, further house price appreciation, and ultimately increases in lending. Based on this analysis, EBA does not object to the two-year extension of the period of application of the measure.
Two IRB banks are operating in Estonia, which according to the figures provided by Eesti Pank have an aggregate market share of 75% in housing loan stock. During the application period of the original measure, the average risk-weights of IRB banks continued to decline further and the risk-weights floor measure, therefore, provides a backstop. Thus, discontinuing the measure could result in a sizable decrease of capital requirements for the retail residential real estate portfolio of the two IRB banks while concerns about the housing market and risks related to residential real estate lending are increasing. Moreover, it is uncertain how defaults and losses on the retail residential real estate portfolio will behave in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In addition, EBA reiterates its concerns over why other measures laid down in the Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive (CRR and CRD) cannot address risks to the resilience of the banking system stemming from developments in residential real estate markets. EBA also reiterates concerns over the calibration of the risk-weights measure using a stress test. EBA highlights that in the information provided by Eesti Pank, it has not been clarified sufficiently whether the risks considered by the measure have already been accounted for as part of additional capital guidance (Pillar 2 Guidance). EBA notes that the measures which adjust risk-weights and are calibrated based on stress tests can lead to double-counting of risks and capital requirements. In light of the structural nature of risks in the residential real estate market and the trends in the projections of risk-weights by IRB banks, EBA invites Eesti Pank to closely monitor the situation and reassess the appropriateness of the notified measure once risks surrounding the housing market have abated.
Keywords: Europe, Estonia, Banking, Macro-Prudential Measures, CRR, Basel, Residential Real Estate, Credit Risk, IRB Approach, Systemic Risk, Risk Weighted Assets, Opinion, EESTI Pank, EBA
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleBIS and Bank of Italy Issue Update on Sustainable Finance Challenge
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.