IMF published reports under the 2019 Article IV consultations with Finland and Republic of Estonia. These IMF reports assess, among other areas, the soundness of financial sectors in these countries. The IMF assessment shows that banking systems in both Estonia and Finland remain healthy and well-capitalized.
Staff and selected issues reports on Finland. The financial system is sound, with the banking system being well-capitalized and profitable. However, extra measures are needed to address vulnerabilities of borrowers. While Finnish banks are highly exposed to real estate, residential and commercial real estate markets are not obviously overvalued. The recent recommendation to limit the ratio of household debt to income (DTI) is in line with the steps taken in many other countries. A government appointed working group has recommended a comprehensive cap on the DTI ratio, limits on the indebtedness of housing companies, and shortening the maximum maturity of mortgages and housing company loans. The assessment concludes that additional steps could be taken to address financial risks, especially those associated with the increase in housing company and consumer loans. Moving forward to establish the planned comprehensive positive credit registry and stepping up data collection on loans from outside credit institutions is important to limit the possibility of cheating by loan applicants and would also help to assess the increase in consumer credit from the increase in “peer-to-peer” and other non-bank loans. Replacing the loan-to-collateral ratio for mortgage loans by a loan to value cap would further strengthen the macro-prudential toolkit.
Staff and selected issues reports on Estonia. In Estonia, the banking sector is sound, non-performing loans have been low, liquidity coverage ratios are above the regulatory minimum requirements, and banks have ample capital buffers. Macro-prudential policies are appropriate and risks are contained, but continued monitoring is warranted. Directors underscored that macro-prudential policies should contain financial-sector risks that could arise from the low interest rate environment. They encouraged the authorities to continue to monitor broader macro-financial developments, especially real estate and housing related risks, while enhancing the macro-prudential toolkit and standing ready to act, should risks materialize.
- Staff Report on Finland
- Selected Issues Report on Finland
- Staff Report on Estonia
- Selected Issues Report on Estonia
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Estonia, Banking, Article IV, Macro-Prudential Policy, Macro-Prudential Tools, Systemic Risk, NPLs, IMF
Previous ArticleHKMA and BOT Publish Outcomes of Joint Research Project on CBDC
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.