US Agencies Announce Results of Assessment of Bank Resolution Plans
FDIC and FED (the US Agencies) announced their assessment of the resolution plans of the largest and most complex domestic banks. The Agencies did not find any deficiencies or weaknesses that could result in additional prudential requirements for these banks, if not corrected. However, plans from six of the eight banks had shortcomings or weaknesses that raise questions about the feasibility of the plans, but these weaknesses are not severe enough to qualify as a deficiency. The plans to address the shortcomings are due to the agencies by March 31, 2020.
Resolution plans, commonly known as living wills, describe a bank's strategy for rapid and orderly resolution under bankruptcy in the event of material financial distress or failure. In the plans of Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, State Street, and Wells Fargo, the Agencies found shortcomings related to the ability of the firms to reliably produce, in stressed conditions, data needed to execute their resolution strategy. Examples include measures of capital and liquidity at relevant subsidiaries. The agencies did not find shortcomings in the plans from Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan Chase. The agencies also announced that Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo successfully addressed prior shortcomings identified by the agencies in their December 2017 resolution plan review.
The feedback letters have been generated for the assessed banks. For the six banks whose plans have shortcomings, the letter details the specific weaknesses and the actions required. Overall, the letters note that each firm made significant progress in enhancing its resolvability and developing resolution-related capabilities but all firms will need to continue to make progress in certain areas. The feedback letters confirm that the Agencies expect to focus on testing the resolution capabilities of the firms when reviewing their next plans.
At present, the largest, most complex FED-supervised banking organizations are required to file resolution plans by July 01 of each year. All other organizations that are supervised by FED and are subject to the resolution planning rule are required to file by December 31 of each year.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Resolution Plans, Large Banks, Systemic Risk, Living Wills, US Agencies
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Dr. Samuel W. Malone
Sam leads the quantitative research team within the CreditEdge™ research group. In this role, he develops novel risk and forecasting solutions for financial institutions while providing thought leadership on related trends in global financial markets.
Dieter Van der Stock
IFRS subject matter expert; accounting authority; risk management specialist
Previous Article
PRA Keeps Systemic Risk Buffer Rates for Ring-Fenced Banks UnchangedRelated Articles
|
News
MAS Amends Notice 610 on Reporting Templates for Banks in SingaporeMAS published amendments to Notices 610 and 1003 related to submission of statistics and returns, along with the reporting templates and frequently asked questions (FAQs) associated with these Notices.
January 24, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Updates Policy Module on Supervisory Review ProcessHKMA is issuing, by notice in the Gazette, revised versions of two Supervisory Policy Manual modules as statutory guidelines under section 7(3) of the Banking Ordinance. The Supervisory Policy Manual modules are CA-G-5 on “Supervisory Review Process” and SB-2 on “Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading.”
January 24, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
PRA Amends Pillar 2 Capital Framework for BanksPRA published the policy statement PS2/20 that contains the final amendments to the Pillar 2 framework and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP5/19 on updates related to Pillar 2 capital framework.
January 23, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FED Proposes to Revise Information Collection Under Market Risk RuleFED proposed to revise and extend, for three years, FR 4201, which is the information collection under the market risk capital rule.
January 22, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Consults on Stay Rules on Financial Contracts Under FIROHKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628).
January 22, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
MAS Amends Notices on Minimum Liquid Asset Requirements for BanksMAS published amendments to Notices 1015, 613, and 649 related to the minimum liquid assets (MLA) requirements.
January 21, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Publishes Submission on Fintech and RegtechAPRA published its submission, to the Senate Select Committee, on financial technology and regulatory technology.
January 21, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OSFI to Implement Operational Risk Capital Rules for Banks in Q1 2022OSFI decided to move domestic implementation of the revised Basel III operational risk capital requirements from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022.
January 20, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Consults on Guideline on Threshold for Credit Obligations Past DueECB published a draft guideline, along with the frequently asked questions (FAQs), on the definition of the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.
January 20, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
OSFI Consults on Instruction Guide for Termination of Pension PlanOSFI is consulting on draft revisions to the instruction guide for termination of a defined benefit pension plan.
January 20, 2020
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
