The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems. The consultative report contains guidance on the application of the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI) to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. Regulators seek feedback, by December 01, 2021, on the consultative report in general as well as on the questions set out in the report. The standard-setters acknowledge that some issues identified in this report may require further clarification and follow-up work in 2022 and beyond, as the features of certain projects and stablecoin arrangement functions evolve.
Stablecoin arrangements may present some notable and novel features, which relate to the potential use of settlement assets that are neither central bank money nor commercial bank money and carry additional financial risk; the novel features also relate to, the interdependencies between multiple stablecoin arrangements functions, the degree of decentralization of operations and/or governance, and a potential large-scale deployment of emerging technologies such as the distributed ledger technology. This report proposes guidance on the application of the PFMI with respect to these features of stablecoin arrangements, which should help stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities in applying the PFMI to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. The guidance covers issues related to governance, comprehensive risk management, settlement finality, and money settlements:
- When seeking to observe this principle of governance, a systemically important stablecoin arrangements should consider how the stablecoin arrangements' ownership structure and operation allow for clear and direct lines of responsibility and accountability.
- A systemically important stablecoin arrangement should develop appropriate risk-management frameworks and tools and should identify and implement appropriate mitigants, taking an integrated and comprehensive view of its risks.
- A systemically important stablecoin arrangement should provide clear and final settlement, regardless of the operational settlement method used; it should clearly define the point at which a transfer on the ledger becomes irrevocable and technical settlement happens and make it transparent whether and to what extent there could be a misalignment between technical settlement and legal finality.
- A stablecoin used by a systemically important stablecoin arrangement for money settlements should have little or no credit or liquidity risk. In assessing the risk presented by the stablecoin, the stablecoin arrangement should consider whether the stablecoin provides its holders with a direct legal claim on the issuer and/or claim on, title to or interest in the underlying reserve assets for timely convertibility at par into other liquid assets such as claims on a central bank. It should also consider whether the stablecoin has a clear and robust process for fulfilling holders’ claims in both normal and stressed times.
This report is not intended to create additional standards for stablecoin arrangements but rather to provide more clarity to systemically important stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities as those stablecoin arrangements seek to observe the PFMI. CPMI and IOSCO may further examine regulatory, supervisory, and oversight issues associated with stablecoin arrangements and, as appropriate, coordinate with other standard-setting bodies to address the outstanding gaps. CPMI and IOSCO believe that guidance on the application of the PFMI with respect to these features of stablecoin arrangements is useful for stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities in applying the PFMI to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. The guidance focuses on a subset of the PFMI for which the CPMI and IOSCO consider that guidance is warranted in light of notable features of stablecoin arrangements as compared to existing financial market infrastructures. This guidance should be read in conjunction with the relevant principles, key considerations, and explanatory notes of the PFMI as well as with the further considerations provided in Section 3. This report is a key contribution to the G20 roadmap on cross-border payments and supports the FSB work in this area.
Comment Due Date: December 01, 2021
Keywords: International, Banking, Stablecoin, Fintech, Regtech, Governance, PFMI, FMI, Cross-Border Payments, G20, Operational Risk, Systemic Risk, CPMI, IOSCO
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleEBA and EIOPA Set Out Work Priorities for 2022
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)