Featured Product

    FSB to Evaluate Effects of Too-Big-To-Fail Reforms for Systemic Banks

    May 23, 2019

    FSB is seeking feedback as part of its evaluation of the effects of the too-big-to-fail reforms for banks. To this end, FSB published a reference document, known as summary terms of reference, which details the objectives, scope, and process of the evaluation of too-big-to-fail reforms. Feedback, including evidence in support of the responses, should be submitted by June 21, 2019. FSB will consider the feedback it receives while preparing its draft report, which will be issued for public consultation in June 2020. The evaluation will be completed once final report is published by the end of 2020.

    The evaluation, which is being conducted by a working group chaired by Claudia Buch (Vice-President of Deutsche Bundesbank), will assess whether the implemented reforms are reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with the systemically important banks. It will also examine the broader effects of the reforms to address too-big-to-fail (for systemically important banks) on the overall functioning of the financial system. FSB is inviting feedback from banks, other financial institutions, academics, think tanks, industry, and consumer associations on the following issues:

    • To what extent are too-big-to-fail reforms achieving their objectives, as described in the terms of reference? Are they reducing the systemic and moral hazard risks associated with systemically important banks?
    • Which types of too-big-to-fail policies (for example: higher loss absorbency, total loss-absorbing capacity, more intensive supervision, resolution and resolvability) have had an impact on systemically important banks and how? 
    • Is there any evidence that the effects of these reforms differ by type of bank (for example: global vs. domestic systemically important banks)?
    • What have been the broader effects of these reforms on financial system resilience and structure, the functioning of financial markets, the global financial integration, or the cost and availability of financing?
    • Have there been any material unintended consequences from the implementation of these reforms to date?
    • Any other issues related to the effects of too-big-to-fail reforms that have not been covered in the questions above.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: June 21, 2019

    Keywords: International, Banking, Too-Big-To-Fail, Systemic Risk, TLAC, Resolution, Crisis Management, FSB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    ECB Allows Temporary Relief in Leverage Ratio Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

    ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Launch Survey on Templates for Product Disclosures Under SFDR

    ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Proposes Integrated Reporting Framework to Reduce Burden for Banks

    ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Finalizes Methodology to Assess CCR and A-CVA Risk of Banks

    ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Opinion on Definition of Credit Institution in CRR

    EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Consults on Alignment of Daily Liquidity Report for Banks

    APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Releases Scenarios for Second Round of Stress Tests on Banks

    FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED to Temporarily Revise FR Y-14 Reports to Conduct Stressed Analysis

    FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Revises Information Collection Under Market Risk Capital Rule

    FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Seeks Input on ESG Disclosure Practices of Banks

    EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5809