The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a report that discusses how excessive regulatory complexity can contribute to systemic risk and possible ways to address the issue. The report establishes seven broad principles that would help make financial regulation more robust—adaptability, diversity, proportionality, resolvability, systemic perspective, information availability, and non-regulatory discipline.
The report starts with an explanation of the recent perceived increase in regulatory complexity and tries to identify the factors behind it. It then presents the channels through which regulatory complexity can contribute to systemic risk and the downsides of a simple regulatory framework. While it does not question the need for, or extent of, financial regulation, the report considers that the observed degree of complexity in financial regulation may limit its effectiveness in dealing with systemic risk. Some actions to address the current degree of regulatory complexity are presented in the last section of the report. To address systemic risk optimally, the report concludes that current financial regulation should be made more robust to uncertainty.
The report argues that complex regulation is not necessarily the best response to the complexity of the financial system. However, it calls for cost-effective and robust financial regulation rather than deregulation or overly simple regulation. Addressing regulatory complexity by promoting overly simple regulation would not generate an optimal outcome in terms of systemic risk. The regulatory framework would not be able to capture the inherent complexity of the financial system and would place excessive focus on reducing the regulatory burden, possibly at the expense of improving the incentive structure of regulated entities. In the long term, this could increase the societal costs of systemic crises. The report contributes to the ongoing debate on the optimal form of financial regulation, taking an approach focused on addressing systemic risk in the whole financial system within the context of a continuously evolving environment.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Complexity, Systemic Risk, Proportionality, Resolvability, ESRB
Previous ArticleNick Cook of FCA on Moving from Innovation Hub to Innovation Culture
FED proposed three-year extension, without revision, of the information collection FR 4202, titled "Recordkeeping Provisions Associated with Stress Testing Guidance."
FCA updated the draft guidance for firms to ensure that mortgage customers whose homes may be repossessed are treated fairly and appropriately, particularly where there are risks of harm to customers who are vulnerable as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
FCA issued a statement on the cessation or loss of representativeness of the 35 LIBOR benchmark settings published by ICE Benchmark Administration or IBA.
EBA published a package that includes the final draft implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting and disclosures of investment firms.
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.