IMF published its staff report and selected issued report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with Germany. Directors welcomed the progress in implementing the FSAP recommendations. They noted the low profitability in both the bank and life insurance sectors, the elevated macro-financial vulnerabilities, and the rapidly rising real estate prices in dynamic cities. Directors underscored the need to monitor interest rate risk and accelerate restructuring efforts to durably enhance financial sector resilience. They welcomed the activation of the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) and encouraged further steps to address data gaps that would enable a fuller assessment of potential financial stability risks. They also supported expanding the macro-prudential toolkit, including tools for the commercial real estate market.
The staff report highlighted that low profitability continues to weigh on the banking sector, eroding the ability of banks to generate capital organically and putting them at risk in the event of adverse earnings shocks. Large German banks continue to under-perform European peers in market valuation, reflecting high operating costs, outdated IT systems, provisions for compliance violations, and in some cases legacy costs from exposure to the shipping industry. The full adoption of Basel III—especially the introduction of an output floor for internal risk models—is expected to substantially increase German banks’ minimum capital requirement. As of mid-2018, most German life insures’ solvency ratios were well above the 100% threshold set by supervisors, although nearly two-third of them relied on transitional measures and the dispersion was large. The report mentions that supervisors should continue monitoring interest rate risk and press for faster progress in implementing restructuring plans in both banking and insurance sectors.
According to an analysis by Bundesbank, the average tier 1 capital ratio of German banks would be lower by nearly 2 percentage points if they used historical level of risk provisioning. Meanwhile, banks that rely on internal models to calculate regulatory capital have reduced risk-weights and there is evidence of “search for yield” behavior. These trends, alongside rising real estate prices and weak bank profitability, point to a rise in macro-financial vulnerabilities. Given the buildup of macro-financial vulnerabilities, a tightening of macro-prudential policies is appropriate to enhance resilience in the banking system. In May, the Financial Stability Committee recommended to raise the CCyB by 0.25% and banks have 12 months from the beginning of third quarter of 2019 to meet the new requirement. The relatively small increase in the CCyB should have limited impact on credit supply, which is only now recovering after nearly two decades of deleveraging.
The assessment concludes that additional macro-prudential action is needed to guard against imbalances in the real estate sector; these actions could include urgently addressing data gaps, considering prompt activation of the existing borrower-based measures, and expanding the macro-prudential toolkit. The authorities shared the view that risks to financial stability are building up, yet did not see acute systemic risks. Based on the available indicators and information, the authorities saw no substantial increase in risks to financial stability stemming from the flow of new housing loans, which would require an activation of sector-specific demand-side macro-prudential policy tools.
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Insurance, Article IV, FSAP, CCyB, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Basel III, Financial Stability, IMF
Previous ArticleIAIS Publishes Global Insurance Market Report for 2018
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).