HKMA Updates Liquidity Facilities Framework for Banks
HKMA updated the framework for provision of HKD liquidity to authorized institutions, with immediate effect. Post completion of a review of the framework, HKMA has introduced a new Resolution Facility to provide for the scenario in which HKMA exercises resolution powers under the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (FIRO), as the designated resolution authority. HKMA also made a number of refinements to various established arrangements within the updated framework. In this framework, “banks” refers to licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies.
Through the different liquidity facilities, HKMA makes temporary HKD liquidity (that is, not in the nature of capital support) available to authorized institutions to maintain integrity and stability of the monetary and financial systems in Hong Kong. The updated liquidity facilities framework makes operational an important part of the resolution regime in Hong Kong and takes forward a key recommendation of the 2018 Peer Review of Hong Kong by FSB. The updated liquidity facilities framework comprises the following:
- Settlement Facilities (Intraday repo and discount window), the objective of which is to facilitate smooth operation of the interbank payment system and thus preserve systemic stability.
- Standby Liquidity Facilities (including term repos and foreign exchange swaps), the objective of which is to make term liquidity available to authorized institutions to enable them to manage any unexpected liquidity tightness which they may encounter.
- Contingent Term Facility, which makes reference to the guiding principles of the previous Lender of Last Resort arrangements. It may be made available, at the discretion of HKMA, to an authorized institution facing extraordinary liquidity stress that cannot be overcome through other means.
- Resolution Facility, which is designed to provide for the scenario in which resolution powers under the FIRO are exercised by HKMA as the resolution authority.
The newly introduced Resolution Facility may be made available, at the discretion of HKMA, having regard to systemic stability, for ensuring that an authorized institution that has (or whose holding company has) gone into resolution in Hong Kong has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations, until such time as the authorized institution is able to transition back to market-based funding. The terms on which liquidity is provided under the Resolution Facility will be set by the HKMA on a case-by-case basis. The Resolution Facility will be available only where resolution has been initiated under the FIRO. Additionally, any losses arising from assistance provided under the Resolution Facility may ultimately be recovered pursuant to the levy arrangements that may be imposed under the FIRO. This updated framework supersedes the “Policy Statement on the Role of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority as Lender of Last Resort,” which was issued in March 2009.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Systemic Risk, Liquidity Facility, Lender of Last Resort, Resolution Ordinance, HKMA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Previous Article
IMF Publishes Reports on 2019 Article IV Consultation with KoreaRelated Articles
PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
EC to Defer Application of SFDR Standards Till July 2022
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
EIOPA Consults on Reporting and Disclosures Under Solvency II
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
BoE Consults on Approach to Setting MREL, Publishes Bail-In Guidance
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
EBA Seeks Views on Proportionality Assessment Methodology
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
US Agencies Propose Changes to Call Reports and Instructions
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
PRA Finalizes Rulebook Definition of Higher Paid Material Risk-Taker
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
