APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ) conveying its expectations for the authorized deposit-taking institutions on the credit risk capital treatment of loans covered by the Coronavirus SME Guarantee Scheme and the SME Recovery Loan Scheme. The Coronavirus SME Guarantee Scheme and the SME Recovery Loan Scheme may be regarded as an eligible guarantee by the Australian government for risk-weighting purposes. For both secured and unsecured lending, the uncovered portion of the exposure must be risk-weighted according to the risk-weight applicable to the original counterparty.
In relation to the covered portion of the exposure, authorized deposit-taking institutions utilizing the
- standardized approach may apply a risk-weight appropriate to the Australian government, in accordance with Attachment A to the prudential standard APS 112 on the standardized approach to credit risk.
- internal ratings-based approach may apply a risk-weight derived by using the relevant substitution approach in accordance with the requirements specified in the prudential standard APS 113 on the internal ratings-based approach to credit risk.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Credit Risk, FAQ, Internal Ratings Based Approach, Standardized Approach, APS 113, APS 112, Loan Guarantee, COVID-19, APS 220, Regulatory Capital, Basel, APRA
Previous ArticleRBNZ Raises Concerns About Risk Governance Processes at Westpac NZ
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.