RBNZ raised concerns about the risk governance processes of Westpac NZ and instructed the bank to commission two independent reports to address the concerns. RBNZ is requiring Westpac to provide an independent report that assesses the risk governance processes and practices applied by the Westpac NZ Board and executive management. RBNZ is also requiring Westpac NZ to provide a separate independent report to offer assurance about the effectiveness of actions taken to improve the management of liquidity risks and the culture surrounding it. Until RBNZ is satisfied, RBNZ is increasing the bank's required holding of liquid assets (cash or assets that can be easily converted into cash).
Westpac NZ was found to be in breach of the requirements of the RBNZ Liquidity Policy (BS13), which includes compliance with minimum mismatch ratios. The mismatch ratio is a measure of a bank’s liquid assets, adjusted for expected cash inflows and outflows to mitigate risk during a period of stress. Westpac NZ was non-compliant with its liquidity requirements because it was not calculating its mismatch ratios correctly. This had a material impact on the bank’s mismatch ratios with the non-compliance occurring from 2012 to 2020. The calculations have since been corrected and Westpac NZ has progressed a program of remediation to address the root causes of the non-compliance.
The required independent reviews come under Section 95 of RBNZ Act 1989, which gives RBNZ the power to require a bank to provide a report by the RBNZ-approved independent person. RBNZ will work with Westpac NZ to implement the findings of the report. It is to be noted that RBNZ is confident that the current liquidity and funding positions of Westpac NZ are sound and that the bank is well-capitalized. The reviews are intended to ensure that this remains the situation on an ongoing basis.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Westpac, Governance, Liquidity Risk, Basel, RBNZ
Previous ArticlePRA Amends Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)