FHFA and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) proposed a new regulatory capital framework for the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)—collectively known as the Enterprises. The proposed rule would make certain conforming amendments to definitions in the FHFA regulations for assessments and minimum capital. It would also remove the OFHEO Regulation on capital for the Enterprises. Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2020.
This proposed rule is a re-proposal of the regulatory capital framework set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2018. The 2018 proposal, which remains the foundation of this proposed rule, contemplated risk-based capital requirements based on a granular assessment of credit risk specific to different mortgage loan categories as well as two alternatives for an updated leverage ratio requirement. The proposed rule contemplates a number of key enhancements to the 2018 proposal, including:
- Simplifications and refinements of the grids and risk multipliers for the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures, including removal of the single-family risk multipliers for loan balance and the number of borrowers
- A countercyclical adjustment to the credit risk capital requirements for single-family mortgage exposures
- A prudential floor on the credit risk capital requirement for mortgage exposures
- Refinements to the capital treatment of credit risk transfers structures, including a minimum capital requirement on senior tranches of credit risk transfers retained by an Enterprise and an adjustment to reflect that credit risk transfers does not have the same loss-absorbing capacity as equity capital
- The addition of a credit risk capital requirement for Enterprise cross-holdings of mortgage-backed securities
- Risk-based capital requirements for a number of other exposures not explicitly addressed by the 2018 proposal
- Supplemental capital requirements based on the Basel framework's definitions of total capital, tier 1 capital, and CET1 capital
- Capital buffers that would subject an Enterprise to increasing limits on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to the extent that its regulatory capital falls below the prescribed buffer amounts
- A stability capital buffer tailored to the risk that an Enterprise's default or other financial distress could have on the liquidity, efficiency, competitiveness, and resiliency of national housing finance markets
- A revised method for determining operational risk capital requirements, as well as a higher floor
- A requirement that each Enterprise maintain internal models for determining its own estimates of risk-based capital requirements
The regulatory capital framework contemplated by the proposed rule would require each Enterprise to maintain total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, adjusted total capital of not less than 8.0% of risk-weighted assets, tier 1 capital of not less than 6.0% of risk-weighted assets, and common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital of not less than 4.5% of the risk-weighted assets. Each Enterprise would be also required to satisfy the following leverage ratios—core capital of not less than 2.5% of adjusted total assets and tier 1 capital of not less than 2.5% of the adjusted total assets.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: August 31, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Regulatory Capital, CET 1, Basel, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Leverage Ratio, Fannie Mae, Fannie Mac, FHFA
Previous ArticleFCA Extends Implementation Timeline for SM&CR Solo-Regulated Firms
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to ten questions.