FCA Guidance on Framework to Assess Adequacy of Financial Resources
FCA published the final guidance on a framework that explains approach to the assessment of adequate financial resources, for all FCA solo-regulated firms subject to threshold conditions and/or the Principles for Businesses (PRIN). FCA also provides further guidance on the meaning of adequate financial resources. The guidance sets out the role of adequate financial resources in minimizing harm, the practices firms can adopt when assessing adequate financial resources, and how FCA assesses the adequacy of financial resources of a firm. Through CP19/20, FCA had consulted on the purpose of adequate financial resources and its expectations about the practices firms should adopt for the assessment of adequate financial resources. The consultation took place from June 13, 2019 to September 13, 2019. Annex 1 to the guidance contains the feedback statement on the consultation.
FCA expects a firm’s assessment to be proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of it’s activities. All firms should assess the risks inherent in their business model, examine the potential harm that can be caused, and explain how to close the business in an orderly way. The guidance mentions the expectations of FCA from firms to reduce the potential to cause harm. These are related to adequate capital resources, governance and culture, identification and assessment of the impact of harm, assessment of additional risks to the firm, viability and sustainability of the business model and strategy, and wind down planning. Firms are required to hold an appropriate level of capital and/or liquid resources to cover the potential harm. Capital includes elements of a firm’s equity and appropriate loss-absorbing debt liabilities that rank behind general creditors, such as share capital and retained earnings, and subordinated debt.
The FCA review and feedback regarding firms’ own assessment of adequate financial resources aims to:
- Ensure firms have robust systems and controls, governance, leadership, and a culture that reduces the risk of harm to consumers and markets
- Ensure the existence of a proportionate and consistent approach in the assessments of adequate financial resources
- Have firms hold adequate resources that reflect the harm they may cause to consumers or UK financial markets
- Reduce the likelihood that failure would impact consumers and the UK financial system
- Minimize harm in the event of the failure of a firm as exits the market, by having the firm hold adequate resources and implement effective wind-down arrangements
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Capital, Governance, Proportionality, Adequate Financial Resources, Wind-Down Planning
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Trevor Howes
IFRS 17 technical advisor; AXIS actuarial modeling system expert; extensive experience in life insurance and life reinsurance, with focus on modeling, valuation, and financial reporting
Previous Article
HM Treasury Consults on Approach to Transposition of BRRD 2Related Articles
APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
