EC has extended, by an additional year, the current transitional regime for the capital requirements that EU banks and investment firms must maintain when exposed to non-EU central counterparties (CCPs). This transitional regime will thus continue to apply until June 28, 2022. This is the last and final extension possible under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). Exposures to the non-EU CCPs that will not be recognized by ESMA by June 28, 2022 will no longer be eligible for lower capital requirements after that date. EC suggests stakeholders to start preparing for this possibility. In addition, EC announced that CRR2 and Investment Firms Directive/Regulation (IFD/IFR) will apply from June 28, 2021 and June 26, 2021, respectively.
The CRR regime establishes the prudential requirements for banks and large investment firms, in particular for capital and liquidity, as well as requirements on reporting of prudential information to supervisors and on disclosing prudential information to the markets. The new CRR2 rules will introduce more proportionality into EU rules for smaller financial institutions and increase resilience of the banking sector by including new requirements for leverage and stable funding. The rules also introduce more risk-sensitive rules for calculating capital requirements. Additionally, the new prudential framework for investment firms set out in the IFR and the IFD is designed to reflect better the nature, size, and complexity of investment firms’ activities compared to the CRR/Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) framework. IFD and IFR will introduce a new tailored, targeted set of rules that will make life simpler for smaller investment firms while the largest, systemic investment firms will remain under the same prudential regime as European banks. The capital requirements set in the IFR comprise three items:
- Fixed overhead requirement, equal to a quarter of the annual fixed overheads of the firm
- Permanent minimum capital requirement of EUR 75,000, EUR 150,000, or EUR 750,000, depending on the activities of the investment firm
- Overall “K-factor” capital requirement, which is the sum of “K-factor requirements” grouped into three categories: Risk-to-Client, Risk-to-Market, and Risk-to-Firm
The IFR and IFD apply to investment firms deemed sufficiently small and non-interconnected (class 3 firms) and to investment firms not falling under any of the other categories (class 2 firms). The large majority of EU investment firms fall in these two categories. Class 3 firms are subject to lighter requirements than class 2 firms. However, some investment firms remain subject to the CRR/CRD rules. This is the case for investment firms that perform dealing on account or underwriting of financial instruments and/or placing of financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and meet a EUR 30 billion threshold for their consolidated assets (class 1 firms). It is also the case for investment firms that perform dealing on account or underwriting of financial instruments and/or placing of financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and meet a EUR 15 billion threshold in terms of their consolidated assets or meet a EUR 5 billion threshold and are designated by their competent authorities following specific criteria (“class 1 minus” firms).
- Notifications on CRR and IFR Regimes
- Press Release on Extension of Transitional Regime
- CRR2 Regulation
- Prudential Rules for Investment Firms
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, CCPs, CRR, IFD, IFR, Basel, Transitional Regime, Regulatory Capital, Qualifying CCPs, CRR2, ESMA, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Report on Monitoring of Additional Tier 1 Instruments
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.