EBA published the fourth report on the monitoring of additional tier 1 (AT1) capital instruments. The updates to this report reflect the amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), the monitoring of the implementation of the EBA opinion on legacy instruments, and observations on new market trends, such as environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-linked capital instruments. The report is intended to inform external stakeholders about the continuing work of EBA in terms of monitoring the issuance of AT1 capital instruments and to present the results of this monitoring.
EBA has focused its work primarily on the assessment of selected AT1 issuances. The terms and conditions of these selected issuances are assessed against the regulatory provisions to identify provisions that EBA would recommend to implement and, in contrast, recommend avoiding. Due to the high standardization of the AT1 issuances, only limited new observations have been added to the report since its last update. The observations are linked to some updates made necessary, for example, by the changes in the Level 1 text, such as the amended eligibility criteria for AT1 and Tier 2 instruments. However, in the context of the end of the transitional period for legacy instruments, EBA draws attention to the need to keep the capital structure simple and avoid additional layers within a capital class that would increase complexity. EBA expects that forthcoming issuances will continue to retain a high level of standardization. Further clarification on the implementation of options in the EBA opinion on legacy instruments is, therefore, provided in the report.
The report also provides an overview of the identified risks and identifies differences of clauses based on a larger set of regulatory ESG transactions in comparison to the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) and minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) monitoring report. The report discusses policy observations on how the clauses used for ESG issuances and the eligibility criteria for own funds and eligible liabilities instruments interact, with the ultimate aim of identifying best practices or practices/clauses that should be avoided. Therefore, the analysis is not meant to address potential compliance issues of ESG bonds with ESG requirements, but it is aimed at clarifying the extent to which some provisions included in ESG bonds may raise regulatory concerns in the context of the eligibility criteria for own funds and liabilities instruments. During the monitoring exercise, EBA has focused its work on the assessment of selected ESG own funds and TLAC and MREL-eligible liabilities instruments. EBA will continue its monitoring and include any new observations in the next update of the AT1 report, in particular on the monitoring of the implementation of the EBA opinion on legacy instruments at the end of the grandfathering period and on the development of ESG capital bonds.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, Basel, Additional Tier 1, ESG, Regulatory Capital, Green Bonds, TLAC, MREL, Sustainable Finance, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes to Amend Technical Standards on Credit Risk Adjustments
The European Commission (EC) published a public consultation on the review of revised payment services directive (PSD2) and open finance.
The European Commission (EC) has issued two letters mandating the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to jointly propose amendments to the regulatory technical standards under Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation or SFDR.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on convergence of supervisory practices for 2021. Additionally, following a request from the European Commission (EC),
The Farm Credit Administration published, in the Federal Register, the final rule on implementation of the Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) methodology for allowances
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) looks set to intensify focus on crypto-assets and cyber risk and extended the comment period on the proposed rules to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility and issued an update on the operational preparedness for zero and negative market interest rates.
The Commission for the Financial Market (CMF) in Chile published capital adequacy ratios (as of February 2022, January 2022, and December 2021) for 17 banks and for the banking system.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on the European Banking Authority (EBA) guidelines on management of non-performing exposures (NPEs) and forborne exposures.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) updated the implementing technical standards that specify the data collection for the 2023 supervisory benchmarking exercise in relation to the internal approaches used in market risk, credit risk, and IFRS 9 accounting.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a feedback statement on the responses received to the consultation on blockchain and smart contracts in insurance.