ESRB released the quarterly risk dashboard at its December Board meeting. The risk dashboard provides a set of quantitative and qualitative indicators of systemic risk in the financial system in EU. The overview note accompanying the risk dashboard summarizes the recent development of indicators and contains two annexes describing the methodology and the covered risk indicators. This issue of risk dashboard highlights that debt levels remain elevated across countries and sectors in EU, although, over the past years, most countries have deleveraged somewhat. Additionally, at the December meeting, the General Board discussed work being done in the areas of Solvency II review, macro-prudential policy beyond banking, cyber risk, and IFRS 9 impact, in addition to announcing the upcoming ESRB publications on these topics.
The banking sector capitalization stood broadly unchanged, while the reduction of non-performing loans halted. The median common equity tier 1 to risk-weighted assets ratio remained broadly stable 15.5% in the third quarter of 2019, though the decline of the median ratio of non-performing loans to total gross loans and advances halted at about 2.8% in the third quarter of 2019. While credit standards remained relatively stable with some bouts of volatility in 2019, a minor easing of credit standards was registered over the last quarter, both for loans to households for house purchases and for loans to non-financial corporations. Additionally, the residential real estate prices continued to rise considerably in all but one EU member states. The median solvency ratio of the EU insurance sector stabilized at nearly 195%, after a decrease during the previous quarter. In terms of asset allocation, no significant changes existed either in the credit quality characteristics of EU insurers’ bond portfolio or in the liquidity profile of the assets.
The following are the key highlights of the December Board meeting:
- The General Board identified cyber risk as a source of systemic risk to the financial system. A critical point in assessing whether a cyber incident will develop into a systemic financial crisis is whether or not the incident escalates from an operational level to take on financial and confidence dimensions. The ESRB’s analysis, which will be published in the coming months, illustrates how a cyber incident could, under certain circumstances, rapidly escalate from an operational outage to a liquidity crisis. ESRB is continuing to work on cyber risk, focusing on how to mitigate the vulnerabilities identified and on the role of authorities in a systemic cyber crisis.
- In its report on global dimensions of macro-prudential policy, which will be published in the first quarter of 2020, the Advisory Scientific Committee noted that stronger coordination in the field of macro-prudential policy would be key to addressing potential cross-border spillovers and leakages of domestic macro-prudential measures.
- In line with its strategy for expanding macro-prudential policy beyond banking, the General Board believes that the review of Solvency II should result in a revised framework that better reflects macro-prudential considerations. In this context, the General Board considered solvency tools for preventing and mitigating procyclical investment behavior, liquidity tools for addressing risks stemming from the asset and liability side (such as those resulting from hedging with derivatives or from specific insurance products), and tools for addressing risks stemming from the provision of credit to the economy by insurer. These proposals will be described in a forthcoming ESRB report and summarized in the ESRB response to the EIOPA consultation on the review of Solvency II.
- The General Board noted that the concentration of financial instruments measured at fair value according to IFRS 9 and IFRS 13 and classified in Levels 2 and 3 remains high. The General Board noted that as accounting numbers are inputs into the calculation of prudential regulatory requirements, behavior of banks, market perceptions, and supervisory actions may be affected—depending on the extent to which Level 2 and 3 financial instruments can move banks away from their desired regulatory targets in time of stress. It underlined the need for greater transparency in this regard. These findings will be summarized in the ERSB report, which will be published in the first quarter of 2020.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Risk Dashboard, Systemic Risk, Solvency II, IFRS 9, Cyber Risk, Credit Risk, Macro-prudential Policy, ESRB
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleMAS Amends Regulation on Reporting of Derivatives Contracts
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.