Featured Product

    FSI Chairman on Rules Versus Discretion in Early Intervention Regime

    September 12, 2017

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) Chairman Mr. Fernando Restoy spoke at the FSI-IADI Meeting on early supervisory intervention, resolution, and deposit insurance in Basel, Switzerland. He focused on the evolution, nature, and use of early intervention frameworks, including their role during the financial crisis. He also discussed the appropriate balance between rules and discretion in the context of early intervention frameworks and concluded by providing some high-level observations on this.

    The FSI Chairman highlighted that legislation or prudential regulation requires supervisors to impose or, at least formally consider imposing, certain supervisory actions if a financial institution breaches defined thresholds or meets certain conditions. Depending on the jurisdictions involved, those regimes are referred to as prompt corrective action or early intervention measures. The FSI Chairman also talked about finding the right balance between rules and discretion, particularly in the context of taking action against weak banks. The limited data points from the financial crisis indicate a pragmatic application of the early intervention rules in both the United States and the EU. In both cases, the evidence suggests that, in practice, corrective actions taken against systemically important weak banks were addressed by supervisors using mainly their normal supervisory powers, which are typically more discretionary and discreet in nature. Public disclosures of formal early intervention actions and the potential adverse effects such disclosures might have on financial stability may also have contributed to the use of more discreet supervisory powers in both the United States and the EU. In conclusion, Mr. Restoy shared the following thoughts on the implications for the design and role of early intervention frameworks as well as on some key implementation challenges: 

    • Supervisors must have the necessary powers to take a range of discretionary measures during the normal course of supervision.
    • Effective discretionary-based supervisory actions should be taken well before a bank starts showing stress in its capital position. Various forward-looking, judgment-based supervisory tools that have been introduced post-crisis (such as supervisory review of business models and supervisory stress tests) provide a tangible means of addressing problems at an early stage.
    • Formal early intervention regimes, such as prompt corrective action and early intervention measures, are useful backstops to discretionary-based, forward-looking supervisory tools. Nevertheless, supervisors need to retain sufficient flexibility in their use of enforcement tools to tailor the supervisory response to institution- and context-specific circumstances.
    • Close cooperation among all relevant players—supervisors, deposit insurers and resolution authorities—is particularly important in dealing with problem banks. While fully respecting the specific responsibilities of the supervisory authority to assess banks' solvency and viability, all relevant safety-net players must be involved when supervisory action is taken against weak banks, not only when those banks are subject to formal early intervention regimes or when they are failing or likely to fail.

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: International, Banking, Prompt Corrective Action, Early Intervention Measures, Resolution, Deposit Insurance, FSI

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA to Transition to Annual Stress Testing of Large Banks in 2020

    APRA published key findings of the stress testing assessment conducted on authorized deposit-taking institutions.

    February 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Review of Non-Financial Reporting Directive

    EC is launched a consultation on the review of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive or NFRD (Directive 2014/95/EU, as part of its strategy to strengthen sustainable investment in Europe.

    February 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on Standards for Supervisory Reporting Under PEPP Rule

    EIOPA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and cooperation, as mandated by the Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) Regulation (Regulation 2019/1238).

    February 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Report on Transfer of Liquidity from EONIA Products to €STR

    ECB published a report on the transfer of liquidity from the cash and derivatives products of the Euro Overnight Index Average (EONIA) to the Euro Short-Term Rate (€STR).

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Publishes Report on Systemic Cyberattacks

    ESRB published a report that explores systemic implications of cyber incidents, such as cyberattacks.

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Chair Sets Out Key Deliverables for G20 Presidency of Saudi Arabia

    FSB published a letter from the Chair Randal K. Quarles to the G20 finance ministers and Central Bank governors ahead of the meetings in Riyadh on February 22-23.

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Proposes Rules on Derivative Position Limits and Swap Execution

    CFTC approved a proposed rule on position limits for derivatives and a proposed rule amending requirements for certain Swap Execution Facilities and real-time reporting.

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BOJ Deputy Governor Speaks on Interest Rate Benchmark Reform in Japan

    The Deputy Governor of BOJ Masayoshi Amamiya spoke in Tokyo about how Japan should proceed with interest rate benchmark reform over the next two years until the end of 2021, when the discontinuation of LIBOR is expected.

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Appoints Heads of Innovation Hubs in Singapore and Switzerland

    BIS announced key personnel appointments to the Innovation Hubs in Singapore and Switzerland.

    February 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Proposes New Benchmark Rate for Qualifying Uninsured Mortgages

    OSFI announced that it is considering a new benchmark rate for determining the minimum qualifying rate for uninsured mortgages.

    February 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4708