FDIC is adopting the Supervisory Guidance on Model Risk Management, with technical conforming changes, thereby making the guidance applicable to certain FDIC-supervised institutions. The guidance was previously issued by the FED (SR 11-7) and the OCC (OCC Bulletin 2011-12). FDIC is adopting this guidance to facilitate consistent model risk-management expectations across the banking agencies and industry. The guidance addresses supervisory expectations for model risk management, which includes model development, implementation, and use; model validation; and governance, policies, and controls.
FDIC is adopting the guidance with the technical conforming changes, including revised definition of "banks" to reflect the FDIC's supervisory authority and its expectations that the Supervisory Guidance generally pertains to FDIC-supervised institutions with USD 1 billion or more in total assets and including revised references to the existing guidance to reflect the FDIC guidance. It is not expected that this guidance will pertain to the FDIC-supervised institutions with under USD 1 billion in total assets, unless the institution's model use is significant, complex, or poses elevated risks to the institution. Some FDIC-supervised institutions have increased their reliance on models for various functions, such as credit management, operational risk, valuation, and stress testing.
Previous ArticleFSI Chairman on Rules Versus Discretion in Early Intervention Regime
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.