Featured Product

    CFTC Chairman on Path Forward in Cross-Border Supervision of CCPs

    September 11, 2017

    CFTC published the translation of an article written by its Chairman Chris Giancarlo in French. In this article titled “Deference is the Path Forward in Cross-Border Supervision of CCPs,” the CFTC Chairman discusses the post-financial crisis swaps reform efforts. He asserts “It is notable that the G-20 leaders pledged their efforts to the consistent implementation of global standards rather than identical implementation. It follows that the best route to “consistent implementation” is the through mutual deference to comparable foreign regulatory frameworks.”

    After the global financial panic, the G20 leaders agreed on several key reforms. While some of the reforms remain to be implemented, others have been remarkably successful such as the central clearing of swaps. This success gives rise to the new challenges in regulatory oversight, particularly in the area of cross-border supervision of swap central counterparties (CCPs). The CFTC Chairman highlights that "differing approaches" to CCP cross-border supervision can lead to regulatory redundancies and legal uncertainty, which may result in increased costs and disincentives to centrally clear. He adds that the CFTC's regulatory framework for futures gives non-U.S. intermediary firms direct access to U.S. customers on the basis of compliance with regulation of their home jurisdiction. A similar approach is used for many requirements applicable to non-U.S. swaps dealers and major swaps participants. Recently, as part of the common approach between EC and CFTC in the regulation and supervision of cross-border CCPs, CFTC allowed certain EU-based CCPs seeking to operate in the United States to comply with the corresponding EU regulatory requirements. This arrangement "increases regulatory coordination necessary" and "promotes financial stability by helping to ensure that CCPs based in multiple jurisdictions are held to the same high standards."

     

    These deference arrangements not only support the cross-border activities of different actors in the financial markets, but also help avoid fragmentation in the markets, protectionism, and regulatory arbitrage. CFTC staff is looking at how to incorporate deference into other parts of the regulatory framework and form stronger bilateral and multilateral alliances with other regulators. In case a CCP is systemically important in a few jurisdictions and deference may not be possible, joint supervision between the relevant authorities may be a more efficient and practical solution. In conclusion, Mr. Giancarlo reiterates that "increased application of deference is the path forward in the cross-border supervision of CCPs."

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, CCP, Cross-Border Supervision, CFTC

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Publishes Proposal to Increase Transparency of Banking Data

    APRA proposed to substantially increase the volume and breadth of data it makes publicly available on authorized deposit-taking institutions, including banks, credit unions, and building societies.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Consults on Guide to Internal Controls for Credit Rating Agencies

    ESMA launched a consultation on the guidelines on internal controls for credit rating agencies (CRAs).

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Finalizes Directive and Prudential Rules for Investment Firms

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Directive (2019/2034) and Regulation (2019/2033) on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Revises Guideline on Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

    OSFI finalized Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Consults on Framework to Manage Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

    PRA published a consultation paper CP30/19 that sets out proposals to modernize the regulatory framework on outsourcing and third-party risk management.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE, PRA, and FCA Consult to Strengthen Operational Resilience

    BoE, PRA, and FCA published a shared policy summary and coordinated consultation papers on new requirements to strengthen operational resilience in the financial services sector.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Amends Rule on Mapping of External Credit Assessment Institutions

    EC published the implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2028, which amends Regulation 2016/1799, regarding the mapping tables specifying correspondence between the credit risk assessments of external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs) and the credit quality steps set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Second Part of Advice on Implementation of Basel III in EU

    EBA published the second part of its advice on the implementation of Basel III in EU, which complements the report published on August 05, 2019.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Approves European Council Proposal on CCP Recovery and Resolution

    EU ambassadors approved the position of European Council on a proposed framework for clearing houses and their authorities to prepare for and deal with financial difficulties.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Guideline on Foreign Bank Branch Deposit Requirements

    OSFI released the final version of Guideline A-10 on foreign bank branch deposit requirements, along with guideline impact analysis statement.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4268