Featured Product

    CFTC Chairman on Path Forward in Cross-Border Supervision of CCPs

    September 11, 2017

    CFTC published the translation of an article written by its Chairman Chris Giancarlo in French. In this article titled “Deference is the Path Forward in Cross-Border Supervision of CCPs,” the CFTC Chairman discusses the post-financial crisis swaps reform efforts. He asserts “It is notable that the G-20 leaders pledged their efforts to the consistent implementation of global standards rather than identical implementation. It follows that the best route to “consistent implementation” is the through mutual deference to comparable foreign regulatory frameworks.”

    After the global financial panic, the G20 leaders agreed on several key reforms. While some of the reforms remain to be implemented, others have been remarkably successful such as the central clearing of swaps. This success gives rise to the new challenges in regulatory oversight, particularly in the area of cross-border supervision of swap central counterparties (CCPs). The CFTC Chairman highlights that "differing approaches" to CCP cross-border supervision can lead to regulatory redundancies and legal uncertainty, which may result in increased costs and disincentives to centrally clear. He adds that the CFTC's regulatory framework for futures gives non-U.S. intermediary firms direct access to U.S. customers on the basis of compliance with regulation of their home jurisdiction. A similar approach is used for many requirements applicable to non-U.S. swaps dealers and major swaps participants. Recently, as part of the common approach between EC and CFTC in the regulation and supervision of cross-border CCPs, CFTC allowed certain EU-based CCPs seeking to operate in the United States to comply with the corresponding EU regulatory requirements. This arrangement "increases regulatory coordination necessary" and "promotes financial stability by helping to ensure that CCPs based in multiple jurisdictions are held to the same high standards."

     

    These deference arrangements not only support the cross-border activities of different actors in the financial markets, but also help avoid fragmentation in the markets, protectionism, and regulatory arbitrage. CFTC staff is looking at how to incorporate deference into other parts of the regulatory framework and form stronger bilateral and multilateral alliances with other regulators. In case a CCP is systemically important in a few jurisdictions and deference may not be possible, joint supervision between the relevant authorities may be a more efficient and practical solution. In conclusion, Mr. Giancarlo reiterates that "increased application of deference is the path forward in the cross-border supervision of CCPs."

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, CCP, Cross-Border Supervision, CFTC

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    SEC Finalizes Capital and Margin Requirements for Security-Based Swaps

    SEC adopted a package of rules and rule amendments to establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for security-based swaps, under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Revises Prudential Provisioning Expectations for New NPEs

    ECB is revising its supervisory expectations for prudential provisioning of new non-performing exposures (NPEs) specified in the “Addendum to the ECB Guidance to banks on non-performing loans” (Addendum)

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Proposes to Revise Information Collection on Margin Requirements

    CFTC is requesting comments on the burdens associated with certain aspects of the Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (final rule).

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB to Delay Effective Date for Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant all insurance companies that issue long-duration contracts, such as life insurance and annuities, additional time to apply the standard that addresses this area of financial reporting.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.9

    EBA published phase 2 of its technical package on the reporting framework 2.9, which includes validation rules, Data Point Model (DPM) data dictionary, and XBRL taxonomies.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Its Consultation Related to SME Financing

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on a report on the evaluation of the effects of financial regulatory reforms on small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) financing.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ESMA Issue Joint Response to EC Letter on Crypto-Assets

    EBA and ESMA issued a joint response to the EC letter, from July 19, 2019, on crypto-assets.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB on Responses to Consultation on Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on the solvent wind-down of the derivatives and trading book portfolio of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Consultation on Resolvability Disclosures

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on disclosures for resolution planning and resolvability of banks.

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3681