The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that discusses the financial stability implications of the developments in the non-bank financial intermediation sector. The paper lays out a framework for the key channels of systemic risk propagation in the presence of non-bank financial intermediaries, emphasizing the central role of leverage fluctuations through changes in margins. In the framework, deleveraging and "dash for cash" scenarios (as during COVID-19) emerge as two sides of the same coin, rather than being two distinct channels of stress propagation. These findings have implications for the design of non-bank financial intermediary regulations and of central bank backstops.
The paper begins by offering a high-level overview of the increasing footprint of non-bank financial intermediaries in the financial system and looks at selected factors behind their growth. Next, it 2 highlights that systemic risk in non-bank financial intermediary activities often stems from their liability structure—chiefly the use of leverage together with their role in liquidity/maturity transformation. It also describes the mapping between non-bank financial intermediary activities and sources of systemic risk, focusing in particular on those intermediaries that can give rise to substantial liquidity demand during times of market turmoil. Then, it lays out the conceptual framework that formalizes the key channels of systemic risk propagation in market-based intermediation involving non-bank financial intermediaries and uses examples from March 2020 to showcase the key elements of the framework empirically, before finally summarizing key policy and implications and conclusions.
The paper notes that the greater footprint of non-bank financial intermediaries raises the importance of regulations. A key implication of taking a broad-based perspective is that containing solvency risk and addressing investor protection is not sufficient by itself to contain systemic risk. A pure solvency-based perspective is of limited use, since it ignores the externalities and feedback effects that underpin system risk. This calls for a macro-prudential approach toward non-bank financial intermediation regulation. In the new market intermediation ecosystem, margin requirements take on a pivotal role for the propagation of financial conditions through fluctuations in leverage. The paper also finds that the prominent role of the non-bank financial intermediaries has brought benefits by diversifying funding sources, but it has also exacerbated some liquidity imbalances that can, in extreme cases, endanger financial stability. The framework presented in this paper implies that sharp increases in margins, especially after a protracted period of thin margins, will tighten financial conditions for the system as a whole. It also points to a tight link between deleveraging and "dash for cash," as during the COVID-19 pandemic. The systemic relevance of non-bank financial intermediaries raises questions about the appropriate policy strategies. In particular, there is an important correspondence between access to public resources and oversight.
Keywords: International, Banking, NBFI, Liquidity Risk, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, BIS
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying and, where relevant, calibrating the minimum performance-related triggers for simple.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is undertaking the integrated reporting framework (IReF) project to integrate statistical requirements for banks into a standardized reporting framework that would be applicable across the euro area and adopted by authorities in other EU member states.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been awarded the top European Standard for its environmental performance under the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) set out the Financial Services Industry Transformation Map 2025 and, in collaboration with the SGX Group, launched ESGenome.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met, shortly after a gathering of the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), the oversight body of BCBS.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) welcomed the work of the international audit and assurance standard setters—the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
The Bank of England (BoE) published a Statistical Notice (2022/18), which informs that due to the Bank Holiday granted for Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II’s State Funeral on Monday September 19, 2022.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) announced that the European Banking Authority (EBA) has updated its filing rules and the implementation dates for certain modules of the EBA reporting framework 3.2.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper that examines how credit rating agencies accepted by the Eurosystem, as part of the Eurosystem Credit Assessment Framework (ECAF)
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF) for authorized deposit-taking entities to ~USD 33 billion on September 01, 2022.