EC has extended, by an additional year, the current transitional regime for the capital requirements that EU banks and investment firms must maintain when exposed to non-EU central counterparties (CCPs). This transitional regime will thus continue to apply until June 28, 2022. This is the last and final extension possible under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). Exposures to the non-EU CCPs that will not be recognized by ESMA by June 28, 2022 will no longer be eligible for lower capital requirements after that date. EC suggests stakeholders to start preparing for this possibility. In addition, EC announced that CRR2 and Investment Firms Directive/Regulation (IFD/IFR) will apply from June 28, 2021 and June 26, 2021, respectively.
The CRR regime establishes the prudential requirements for banks and large investment firms, in particular for capital and liquidity, as well as requirements on reporting of prudential information to supervisors and on disclosing prudential information to the markets. The new CRR2 rules will introduce more proportionality into EU rules for smaller financial institutions and increase resilience of the banking sector by including new requirements for leverage and stable funding. The rules also introduce more risk-sensitive rules for calculating capital requirements. Additionally, the new prudential framework for investment firms set out in the IFR and the IFD is designed to reflect better the nature, size, and complexity of investment firms’ activities compared to the CRR/Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) framework. IFD and IFR will introduce a new tailored, targeted set of rules that will make life simpler for smaller investment firms while the largest, systemic investment firms will remain under the same prudential regime as European banks. The capital requirements set in the IFR comprise three items:
- Fixed overhead requirement, equal to a quarter of the annual fixed overheads of the firm
- Permanent minimum capital requirement of EUR 75,000, EUR 150,000, or EUR 750,000, depending on the activities of the investment firm
- Overall “K-factor” capital requirement, which is the sum of “K-factor requirements” grouped into three categories: Risk-to-Client, Risk-to-Market, and Risk-to-Firm
The IFR and IFD apply to investment firms deemed sufficiently small and non-interconnected (class 3 firms) and to investment firms not falling under any of the other categories (class 2 firms). The large majority of EU investment firms fall in these two categories. Class 3 firms are subject to lighter requirements than class 2 firms. However, some investment firms remain subject to the CRR/CRD rules. This is the case for investment firms that perform dealing on account or underwriting of financial instruments and/or placing of financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and meet a EUR 30 billion threshold for their consolidated assets (class 1 firms). It is also the case for investment firms that perform dealing on account or underwriting of financial instruments and/or placing of financial instruments on a firm commitment basis and meet a EUR 15 billion threshold in terms of their consolidated assets or meet a EUR 5 billion threshold and are designated by their competent authorities following specific criteria (“class 1 minus” firms).
- Notifications on CRR and IFR Regimes
- Press Release on Extension of Transitional Regime
- CRR2 Regulation
- Prudential Rules for Investment Firms
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, CCPs, CRR, IFD, IFR, Basel, Transitional Regime, Regulatory Capital, Qualifying CCPs, CRR2, ESMA, EC
Previous ArticleEBA Publishes Report on Monitoring of Additional Tier 1 Instruments
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.