FCA published the final guidance on a framework that explains approach to the assessment of adequate financial resources, for all FCA solo-regulated firms subject to threshold conditions and/or the Principles for Businesses (PRIN). FCA also provides further guidance on the meaning of adequate financial resources. The guidance sets out the role of adequate financial resources in minimizing harm, the practices firms can adopt when assessing adequate financial resources, and how FCA assesses the adequacy of financial resources of a firm. Through CP19/20, FCA had consulted on the purpose of adequate financial resources and its expectations about the practices firms should adopt for the assessment of adequate financial resources. The consultation took place from June 13, 2019 to September 13, 2019. Annex 1 to the guidance contains the feedback statement on the consultation.
FCA expects a firm’s assessment to be proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of it’s activities. All firms should assess the risks inherent in their business model, examine the potential harm that can be caused, and explain how to close the business in an orderly way. The guidance mentions the expectations of FCA from firms to reduce the potential to cause harm. These are related to adequate capital resources, governance and culture, identification and assessment of the impact of harm, assessment of additional risks to the firm, viability and sustainability of the business model and strategy, and wind down planning. Firms are required to hold an appropriate level of capital and/or liquid resources to cover the potential harm. Capital includes elements of a firm’s equity and appropriate loss-absorbing debt liabilities that rank behind general creditors, such as share capital and retained earnings, and subordinated debt.
The FCA review and feedback regarding firms’ own assessment of adequate financial resources aims to:
- Ensure firms have robust systems and controls, governance, leadership, and a culture that reduces the risk of harm to consumers and markets
- Ensure the existence of a proportionate and consistent approach in the assessments of adequate financial resources
- Have firms hold adequate resources that reflect the harm they may cause to consumers or UK financial markets
- Reduce the likelihood that failure would impact consumers and the UK financial system
- Minimize harm in the event of the failure of a firm as exits the market, by having the firm hold adequate resources and implement effective wind-down arrangements
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Capital, Governance, Proportionality, Adequate Financial Resources, Wind-Down Planning
Previous ArticleEBA Extends Application Date of Guidelines on Loan Moratoria
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.