FCA published the final guidance on a framework that explains approach to the assessment of adequate financial resources, for all FCA solo-regulated firms subject to threshold conditions and/or the Principles for Businesses (PRIN). FCA also provides further guidance on the meaning of adequate financial resources. The guidance sets out the role of adequate financial resources in minimizing harm, the practices firms can adopt when assessing adequate financial resources, and how FCA assesses the adequacy of financial resources of a firm. Through CP19/20, FCA had consulted on the purpose of adequate financial resources and its expectations about the practices firms should adopt for the assessment of adequate financial resources. The consultation took place from June 13, 2019 to September 13, 2019. Annex 1 to the guidance contains the feedback statement on the consultation.
FCA expects a firm’s assessment to be proportionate to the nature, scale, and complexity of it’s activities. All firms should assess the risks inherent in their business model, examine the potential harm that can be caused, and explain how to close the business in an orderly way. The guidance mentions the expectations of FCA from firms to reduce the potential to cause harm. These are related to adequate capital resources, governance and culture, identification and assessment of the impact of harm, assessment of additional risks to the firm, viability and sustainability of the business model and strategy, and wind down planning. Firms are required to hold an appropriate level of capital and/or liquid resources to cover the potential harm. Capital includes elements of a firm’s equity and appropriate loss-absorbing debt liabilities that rank behind general creditors, such as share capital and retained earnings, and subordinated debt.
The FCA review and feedback regarding firms’ own assessment of adequate financial resources aims to:
- Ensure firms have robust systems and controls, governance, leadership, and a culture that reduces the risk of harm to consumers and markets
- Ensure the existence of a proportionate and consistent approach in the assessments of adequate financial resources
- Have firms hold adequate resources that reflect the harm they may cause to consumers or UK financial markets
- Reduce the likelihood that failure would impact consumers and the UK financial system
- Minimize harm in the event of the failure of a firm as exits the market, by having the firm hold adequate resources and implement effective wind-down arrangements
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Regulatory Capital, Governance, Proportionality, Adequate Financial Resources, Wind-Down Planning
Previous ArticleEBA Extends Application Date of Guidelines on Loan Moratoria
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.