SARB published Directive 5/2021 that sets out the updated capital framework requirements for banks in South Africa. This directive addresses aspects of the prescribed minimum required capital ratios as well as the application of various components of the said capital requirements such as the systemic risk capital requirement (Pillar 2A), the domestic systemically important bank (D-SIB) capital requirement, the countercyclical buffer range, and the capital conservation buffer range. A table in the Annexure A of the directive specifies the Basel III-based minimum capital requirements for a bank, while Annexure B presents phase-in arrangements for the minimum capital requirements. This directive replaces Directive 2/2020 and Directive 4/2020, which were issued in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively.
As part of the current update, the Pillar 2A capital requirement, which had been temporarily reduced to 0% of the risk-weighted exposures for all banks at a total capital level since April 2020, will be reinstated, as set out in Annexure B. To assist banks in appropriately managing their capital plans, the Prudential Authority is notifying banks that the combined total capital adequacy requirement in respect of the Pillar 2A and the higher loss absorbency (HLA) requirement for D-SIBs will not exceed 3.5% of a bank’s risk-weighted exposure. The aggregate requirement will not exceed 2% for common equity tier 1 (CET 1) capital and 2.5% for tier 1 capital. Furthermore, excluding both bank-specific individual capital requirement and the countercyclical buffer requirement, the highest minimum total capital adequacy requirement to be met by any bank or banking group conducting business within South Africa receiving the highest possible HLA requirement for a D-SIB will not exceed 14%. The Prudential Authority will specify the HLA requirement for each individual bank or banking group identified as a D-SIB and this requirement can vary for different D-SIBs.
The Prudential Authority has decided to apply a “bucketing approach” when assigning the relevant HLA requirement for D-SIBs. The first 1% of the specified D-SIB capital requirement, up to a maximum of 1% of a bank’s risk-weighted exposures, must be fully met by CET 1 capital and reserve funds. Any additional requirement, up to the first 1.5% of risk-weighted exposures may be met by tier 1 capital and reserve funds. Any additional requirement to the aforementioned, up to 2.5% of risk-weighted exposures, may be met with total capital and reserve funds. In the event that a bank’s required capital adequacy ratios fall below the levels set out in Annexures A and B, and in the absence of other remedial actions acceptable to the Prudential Authority to improve the bank’s capital adequacy ratios, the capital conservation ratios will be imposed to limit discretionary payments such as dividend distributions. The Prudential Authority will continue to monitor and assess the adequacy of this internal buffer against a bank’s strategy, risk profile, and levels of capital. To avoid confusion in the market, a bank is required to refrain from disclosing to the public its individual capital requirement that is based on a combination of various qualitative and quantitative factors, which are not directly comparable across banks. Banks are required to publicly disclose their D-SIB capital add-ons as part of the composition of regulatory capital disclosures.
In a separate statement, SARB also announced that it has commenced publishing Johannesburg Interbank Average Rate (JIBAR)-related post-trade disclosures on a daily basis, as required by the revised JIBAR Code of Conduct and Operating Rules (Code), which came into effect on April 12, 2021. Strate (Pty) Ltd, as the publishing agent, is responsible for the collation and publication of JIBAR-related market activity and for providing SARB with such data for the purposes of publication and surveillance.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, South Africa, Banking, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Systemic Risk, D-SIB, Pillar 2, JIBAR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Disclosures, HLA Requirement, SARB
Previous ArticleESRB Report Advises to Address Risk of Lowering Lending Standards
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.