The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) revised the guidelines on Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and expects national competent authorities to apply these revised guidelines from July 01, 2022. EIOPA also published a Decision (EIOPA-BoS-21/517) that repeals and replaces the Decision on collection of information under Solvency II (EIOPA- BoS-15/198). The new Decision will enter into force on the day following its adoption and it enhances the scope, not only with respect to Solvency II, but also addresses information on pensions (IORP) and pan-European pension products (PEPP) frameworks. The timelines, channels, and formats of submission have been updated, along with the EIOPA Taxonomy Roadmap. The revised timelines for the national authorities to submit to EIOPA the Quarterly Solvency II information affect only reporting obligations with undertaking or group submission date after the publication of this Decision. Another EIOPA update involves the publication of results of the 2021 insurance stress test, along with an associated factsheet and a set of the frequently asked questions about this exercise.
The 2021 insurance stress test assessed the industry’s resilience to a prolonged COVID-19 scenario in a “lower for longer” interest rate environment. EIOPA also performed a capital and solvency assessment and, for the first time, examined participants’ pre- and post-stress liquidity positions. The test allowed participants to calculate their post-stress position using two distinct approaches: the fixed balance sheet approach without management actions and the constrained balance sheet approach, where reactive management actions were permitted. Based on the results of this exercise, EIOPA will assess the need for issuing recommendations on relevant concerns identified in the exercise. The following are the key findings from the stress test exercise:
- Despite the grave economic and financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the European insurance industry entered the stress test exercise with a strong level of capitalization—evidenced by a solvency ratio of 217.9% at the end of 2020. This robust buffer in the solvency ratio allowed participants absorb the shock of the adverse scenario.
- The capital component of the exercise confirmed that the main vulnerabilities for the sector stem from market shocks, and, specifically, from the decoupling of the risk free rate and risk premia, the so-called double-hit scenario.
- In the fixed balance sheet approach, where no management actions against the prescribed shocks could be enforced, the aggregate solvency ratio decreased by 92.1pp to 125.7%, bringing nine undertakings under the regulatory threshold of 100%. Results improved when participants, under the constrained balance sheet approach, were allowed to take reactive management actions. The actions taken reduced the original drop seen in the fixed balance sheet approach by 13.6pp to an aggregate solvency ratio of 139.3% and helped seven participants return their post-stress solvency ratios to above 100%. The insurance industry, therefore, demonstrated that it has tools at its disposal to cope with adverse market and economic effects.
- Despite the material cut in excess assets over liabilities, none of the participants reported an Assets over Liability ratio below 100%, neither under the fixed nor under the constrained balance sheet approach. This confirms the industry’s ability to meet promises to policyholders amid severe adverse developments of the economy and the markets.
- The long term guarantee measures which are part of the Solvency II regulation helped absorb part of the severe but plausible shocks, limiting the drop in participants’ solvency ratio. Nevertheless, the stress test also revealed that a section of the market still heavily relies on transitional measures, which, unlike long-term guarantees, are to be phased out by 2032. Undertakings should take concrete steps toward reducing their dependence on temporary measures that were put in place to smooth the transition from Solvency I to the Solvency II regime.
- The liquidity component of the stress test showed that the liquidity position of participants appears to be a less significant concern than solvency positions given the sector’s large holdings of liquid assets. Still, outcomes show that insurers cannot rely solely on their cash holdings to cover unexpected outflows.
- LEI Guidelines
- Decision on Information Collection
- Taxonomy Roadmap (XLSX)
- Press Release on Insurance Stress Test
- Report on Insurance Stress Test (PDF)
- Factsheet on Stress Test (PDF)
- FAQs on Stress Test (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, IORP, PEPP, Reporting, Taxonomy, COVID-19, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Liquidity Risk, LEI, Guidelines, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEBA Enhances Proportionality in Reporting, Makes Other Announcements
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) granted license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the Delegated Regulation 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an Opinion on the scale and impact of de-risking in European Union and the steps that competent authorities should take to tackle unwarranted de-risking.
The French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) published its 2022 work priorities, along with the supervisory priorities for 2022.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a determination on a request for an exemption, by RBC US Group Holdings LLC, from certain requirements of the rule implementing the qualified financial contracts (QFC) recordkeeping requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that publication of 24 LIBOR settings has ended and that, going forward, the 6 most widely used sterling and Japanese yen settings will be published using a changed methodology.
The People’s Bank of China (PBC) formulated the recently issued Fintech Development Plan (2022 to 2025) under the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives through the Year 2035.