APRA announced its decision to keep the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent. APRA also published an information paper on CCyB, which notes that APRA is giving consideration to introducing a non-zero default level for the CCyB as part of its broader reforms to the authorized deposit-taking institution capital framework. APRA expects to commence the next stage of its authorized deposit-taking institution capital consultation in the first half of next year. The revised capital framework of APRA is scheduled to come into effect from January 01, 2022.
The CCyB is an additional amount of capital that APRA can require authorized deposit-taking institutions to hold at certain points in the economic cycle to bolster the resilience of the banking sector during periods of heightened systemic risk. It has been set at zero percent of risk-weighted assets since it was introduced in 2016. APRA confirmed it considers that a zero percent CCyB remains appropriate at this point in time based on an assessment of the systemic risk environment for authorized deposit-taking institutions. Among the factors APRA considered in making its decision were:
- Low credit growth
- Minimal change in the risk profile of new housing lending
- Movements in residential property prices, particularly recent growth
- Increased entity costs due to operational risk events and misconduct
In conjunction with the other agencies on the Council of Financial Regulators, APRA will continue to closely monitor financial and economic conditions. APRA reviews the buffer quarterly and may adjust it if future circumstances warrant this.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, CCyB, Systemic Risk, Basel III, Regulatory Capital, APRA
Previous ArticleNCUA Approves Delay of Risk-Based Capital Rules Until January 2022
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).