BCBS published two reports assessing the implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures (LE) framework in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. These reports are a part of the Regulatory Consistency Assessment Program (RCAP) of the Basel Committee. Overall, the NSFR regulations and the LE framework in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have been found to be "compliant" with the Basel standards. This is the highest of the four possible assessment grades.
BCBS has completed the assessments of implementation of Basel III capital and liquidity coverage ratio regulations for all the member jurisdictions. Assessments of implementation of Basel III standards related to the NSFR and large exposures framework started in 2018 and are expected to be completed by September 2020. SAMA had implemented NSFR as a minimum standard as of January 01, 2016. SAMA also implemented the large exposures framework as a minimum standard on January 01, 2016, which is three years ahead of the implementation date provided in the Basel standard. In Saudi Arabia, both regulations are applicable to all 12 locally incorporated banks on a consolidated basis.
The large exposure limits help constrain the maximum loss a bank could face in the event of a sudden failure of a counterparty or a group of connected counterparties and help ensure the bank remains a going concern. NSFR, which is a significant component of the Basel III reforms, requires banks to maintain a stable funding profile in relation to their on- and off-balance sheet activities, thus reducing the likelihood that disruptions to a bank's regular sources of funding will erode its liquidity position in a way that could increase the risk of its failure. NSFR standard of BCBS became a minimum standard by January 01, 2018.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Saudi Arabia, Banking, Basel III, RCAP, Large Exposures, NSFR, BCBS
Previous ArticleESMA Updates Q&A on Securitization Regulation
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards on disclosure of investment policy by investment firms, under the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published version 5.1 of the filing rules for supervisory reporting.
The European Central Bank (ECB) Guideline 2021/1829 on the procedures for the collection of granular credit and credit risk data has been published in the Official Journal of European Union.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published the prudential practice guide CPG 511 to assist banks, insurers, and superannuation licensees in meeting requirements of CPS 511, the new prudential standard on remuneration.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published a bulletin that provides an updated self-assessment tool for banks to evaluate their preparedness for cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that examines the progress made toward disclosures aligned with recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published the progress report on adoption of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) has implemented, in its information system, updates linked to the Data Point Model (DPM) version 3.1.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a thematic note that aims to identify and raise awareness of the transition risks of benchmark rates, as the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and the Euro Overnight Index Average (EONIA) are close to being phased out.
In a letter to the federally regulated financial institutions and pension plans, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published a summary of the feedback received to the January 2021 discussion paper on ways to address climate risks.