APRA has concluded its review of the comprehensive plans of authorized deposit-taking institutions for the assessment and management of loans with repayment deferrals. In a letter addressed to these institutions, APRA encourages these institutions to consider the "better practice(s)" identified during the review of submitted plans. The identified practices span areas such as governance and oversight, customer engagement and contact strategies, credit assessment processes, and credit management and resourcing.
APRA acknowledges that preparation and submission of these plans represents a significant milestone in the transition of borrowers, who have been provided a repayment deferral, back to making repayments where possible. In the letter, authorized deposit-taking institutions are are encouraged to consider the following areas of better practice:
- Governance and oversight. Better practice provided for regular operational reporting to senior management to enable timely escalation of issues that may require management attention and oversight of progress against the implementation of the plan by the Board/Board Committee.
- Customer engagement and contact strategies. Most plans appropriately allowed for sufficient time to contact customers and arrive at a credit decision prior to the expiry of the deferral. Better practice incorporated a series of contacts, using multiple contact media over an extended period of up to six weeks prior to deferral expiry. Additionally, most plans appropriately and definitively considered the treatment of loans for uncontactable customers. Where repayments are to be recommenced for these customers without contact, better practice involved close monitoring the performance of these loans and additional contact strategies where payments are subsequently missed.
- Credit assessment processes. As expected, plans included clear and well-articulated credit assessment processes in circumstances where the borrower requires additional assistance in terms of restructuring loans, extending the deferral, or hardship/default. Better practice incorporated strong quality assurance processes and controls around customer conversations and credit assessment decisions to ensure consistency in customer outcomes were implemented. Better practice also included appropriate controls to detect system and process errors and ensure that borrowers receive assistance in a manner that is consistent with that which has been presented and offered to them by the institution.
- Credit management and resourcing. While material additional resourcing has been committed by many institutions to implement their plan, this was frequently based on best estimates of volumes and time taken for calls, with scope for material variation to occur. Better practice plans incorporated strong operational reporting capability, with regular oversight by Executive Management, supported by contingency plans for identification, training, and allocation of additional resources at short notice, should the need arise.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, COVID-19, Governance, Payment Deferrals, Credit Risk, Basel, APRA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleMAS Amends Notice on Capital Adequacy Requirements of Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.