OCC issued the revised “Concentrations of Credit” booklet (Version 2.0) of the Comptroller’s Handbook. The revised booklet replaces version 1.0 of the “Concentrations of Credit” booklet and rescinds OCC Bulletin 2011-48, “Credit Policy: Concentrations of Credit: Revised Booklet,” which transmitted version 1.0 of the booklet in December 2011.
The booklet discusses risks associated with concentrations of credit and sound concentration risk management processes. It also discusses identifying exposures that constitute concentrations of credit. Examiners should consider conclusions about concentration risk management when assigning capital, asset quality, liquidity, and management component ratings. The revised booklet is relevant for Chief Executive Officers of all national banks, federal savings associations, and federal branches and agencies, among others, and it:
- changes the supervisory calculation for credit concentration ratios for banks that have implemented the current expected credit loss (CECL) transition rule to avoid double-counting the allowance for credit losses in the denominator.
- replaces the term “criticized” with “special mention” for consistency with Banking Bulletin (BB) 1993-35, “Interagency Definition of Special Mention Assets.”
- reflects relevant OCC issuances published since this booklet was last issued.
- reflects changes to laws and regulations that occurred since this booklet was last issued.
- clarifies applicability of references to covered savings associations.
- includes clarifying edits regarding supervisory guidance, sound risk management practices, or legal language.
- revises certain content for general clarity.
- removes the NAICS code listing, as this information is readily available.
Concentrations are calculated as a percentage, using tier 1 capital plus either the allowance for loan and leases losses or the allowance for credit losses (ACL), as appropriate, as the denominator. For banks that have adopted the 2019 or 2020 CECL capital transition rule (refer to 12 CFR 3.301), a portion of the ACL may be included as a component of tier 1 capital for the years that the bank reported its regulatory capital ratios using the allowable capital relief provided by those rules. To eliminate potential double-counting of the ACL in the denominator for purposes of measuring concentrations, the amount of the ACL included as a component of tier 1 capital during the period when a bank reported regulatory capital ratios using the 2019 or 2020 CECL capital transition rule should be subtracted from tier 1 capital. The amount to be subtracted from tier 1 capital is calculated as the difference between retained earnings on Schedule RC “Balance Sheet” (line 26a) and retained earnings on Schedule RC-R, part 1, “Regulatory Capital Components and Ratios” (line 2) of the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income.
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Credit Risk, CECL, Concentration Risk, OCC
A well-recognized researcher in the field; offers many years of experience in the real estate ﬁnance industry, and leads research efforts in expanding credit risk analytics to commercial real estate.
Next ArticlePRA Updates Q&A on Branch Return Form
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.