MAS published a consultation paper on its regulatory approach under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA) for derivatives contracts that reference payment tokens as underlying assets (Payment Token Derivatives). To reflect the intended regulatory scope of Payment Token Derivatives under the SFA (discussed in Section 3 of the consultation paper), MAS is proposing to amend the Securities and Futures (Prescribed Underlying Thing) Regulations 2018. Annex B contains the text for amendments being proposed under the SFA. The consultation closes on December 20, 2019.
MAS has received queries from industry participants about whether Payment Token Derivatives, like those referencing Bitcoin and Ether, fall within the regulatory scope of SFA. MAS has also received indications of interest for Payment Token Derivatives regulated under the SFA to be made available to investors in Singapore. In calibrating the regulatory response, MAS intends to adopt a balanced view that seeks to allow innovation to co-exist in a regulatory environment with high standards. The consultation paper sets out the views of MAS on the appropriate regulatory approach for Payment Token Derivatives under the SFA.
The trading of the most popular digital tokens has largely been on unregulated markets. There has been interest from international institutional investors for a regulated alternative that could mitigate some of the concerns. Such regulated alternatives have recently emerged. In particular, Bitcoin futures have been listed and are traded on the U.S. futures exchanges. A well-regulated market for derivatives—particularly one anchored by institutional investors with sophisticated risk management and investment strategies—can serve as a more reliable reference of value for the underlying asset.
Comment Due Date: December 20, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, Payment Token Derivatives, SFA, Securities and Futures Regulation, Derivatives, MAS
Previous ArticleDNB Responds to the Court of Audit Report on Resolution of Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.