RBNZ Consults on Implementation of Capital Review Changes
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019. As part of these decisions, RBNZ had planned to gradually raise bank capital requirements starting in 2020. However, increases in the required level of capital will now commence from July 01, 2022, to allow banks continued headroom to respond to the shock of COVID-19 crisis, while other Capital Review decisions are due to be implemented from July 01, 2021 onward. The comment period on this consultation will end on March 31, 2021. RBNZ will consider all feedback from stakeholders before finalizing the Banking Prudential Requirements, from July 01, 2021 onward.
RBNZ is consulting on the detailed rules, including the new rules for instruments that make up a bank’s capital and the framework setting out responses RBNZ would take if a bank does not meet capital buffer requirements. The Capital Review implementation consultation is being presented through exposure drafts of revised documents from the Banking Supervision Handbook, which set out the details of the policy framework and rules that apply to registered banks in New Zealand. These changes have been detailed further in the consultation paper titled "Changes to the Banking Supervision Handbook: Exposure Draft for Capital Review Changes." The exposure drafts also form part of the roll-out of the replacement for the Banking Supervision Handbook, which is being restructured—and renamed as Banking Prudential Requirements—to re-organize and clarify the existing Handbook documents. This was one of the key areas for improvement identified during a Regulatory Stocktake that the RBNZ undertook in 2015.
The full, restructured, and renamed Banking Prudential Requirements covering capital adequacy will be in place from July 01, 2021. RBNZ plans to publish the full revamped Banking Prudential Requirements by the end of 2021. As part of this consultation, RBNZ has published drafts of the planned Banking Prudential Requirements (BPRs), which are structured as follows:
- BPR100: Capital adequacy
- BPR110: Capital definitions
- BPR120: Capital adequacy process requirements
- BPR130: Credit risk-weighted assets (RWAs) overview
- BPR131: Standardized credit risk RWAs
- BPR132: Credit risk mitigation
- BPR133: Internal Ratings-Based credit risk RWAs
- BPR134: IRB minimum system requirements
- BPR140: Market risk
- BPR150 and 151: Standardized and Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) operational risk
- BPR160: Insurance, securitization, and loan transfers
- BPR001: Glossary
The remaining of the Banking Prudential Requirements will be rolled out in due course. RBNZ notes that some additional work that will be undertaken in the second half of 2021 to implement dual (standardized and IRB) reporting for IRB banks from the first quarter of 2022. Another key consultation point is the draft text to implement the 2019 Capital Review decisions. RBNZ is also consulting on some new policy decisions that follow from the outcomes of the Capital Review. These decisions are:
- Changes to distribution restrictions, including separate sets of restrictions for distributions on Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) and Additional Tier 1 (AT1) capital
- The Capital Buffer Response Framework (CBRF), which outlines the possible supervisory actions that RBNZ may take as a bank enters into its prudential capital buffer
- A proposal to include template terms sheets for AT1 and Tier 2 capital instruments, which include the prudential requirements for instruments to qualify as capital, as well as market standard requirements (These can be used by banks to issue RBNZ-compliant AT1 and Tier 2 capital instruments.)
- The "notification" process, proposed to replace the current non-objection process, which banks must follow to issue RBNZ-compliant AT1 and Tier 2 capital instruments
Related Links
- News Release
- Exposure Draft of Revised Handbook
- Executive Summary of Consultation (PDF)
- Consultation Paper (PDF)
- Restructure of Banking Supervision Handbook
- Capital Review Go-To-Guide (PDF)
- Letter to Banks, October 20, 2020 (PDF)
Comment Due Date: March 31, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Basel, Reporting, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, RBNZ
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
HKMA Consults on Capital Rules for Bank Equity Investments in FundsRelated Articles
APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
OSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EC Defers Adoption of Regulatory Standards for Disclosures Under SFDR
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
FCA Releases MIFIDPRU Application Forms and Third Set of Rules on IFPR
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
