US Agencies (Farm Credit Administration, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) announced a proposal to change the swap margin rules to facilitate the implementation of prudent risk management strategies at certain banks and swap entities. Furthermore, to aid in the transition away from LIBOR, the agencies proposed to allow certain technical amendments to legacy swaps without altering their status under the swap margin rules. For smaller counterparties, the proposal would provide clarification on documentation requirements and implementation relief. In addition, the proposal would extend the effective date by one year to September 01, 2021, for smaller counterparties to meet initial margin requirements. Comments on the proposal will be accepted until December 09, 2019.
The swap margin rule would no longer require swap entities to hold initial margin for uncleared swaps with affiliates. However, inter-affiliate transactions would still be subject to variation margin requirements. Swap entities regulated by FDIC, FED, and OCC also would be subject to requirements under sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. The proposed rule would:
- Permit swaps entered into prior to an applicable compliance date (legacy swaps) to retain their legacy status in the event that they are amended to replace an interbank offered rate (IBOR) or other discontinued rate
- Repeal the inter-affiliate initial margin provisions
- Introduce an additional compliance date for initial margin requirements
- Clarify the point in time at which trading documentation must be in place
- Permit legacy swaps to retain their legacy status in the event that they are amended due to technical amendments, notional reductions, or portfolio compression exercises
- Make technical changes to relocate the provision addressing amendments to legacy swaps that are made to comply with the Qualified Financial Contract Rules
The Federal Reserve Board continues to work on proposed amendments to Regulation W that would, among other things, clarify the treatment of bank-affiliate derivatives under sections 23A and 23B. Inter-affiliate swaps are typically used for internal risk management purposes, by transferring risk to a centralized risk management function within the firm. The proposal would give firms additional flexibility to allocate collateral internally, supporting prudent risk management strategies that support safety and soundness. The proposal would not change the capital standards for swap entities supervised by the five US Agencies.
In a statement, the FED Governor Lael Brainard said she supports the proposed changes permitting certain amendments to legacy swaps, initial phase-in dates, and documentation requirements. However, she has concerns that eliminating the inter-affiliate initial margin requirement without the necessary changes to strengthen Regulation W could again expose banks and the financial system to risk from the buildup of risky derivatives. During the crisis, the buildup of uncleared swap positions exposed covered swap entities, including banks, to losses and put the broader financial system at risk. In response, pursuant to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal banking agencies adopted a final swap margin rule in 2015 that requires prudent margining practices between covered swap entities, including banks, and their counterparties. These margin requirements are important to protect the safety and soundness of banks that are covered swap entities in the event of a counterparty default and to guard against broader risks to financial stability.
Ms. Brainard said this proposal eliminates these safeguards entirely without proposing compensating adjustments. It does so on the basis of "supervisory experience" since the final rule was implemented. She said, "I supported the 2015 final rule and do not see compelling reasons to reverse it by eliminating these safeguards." Earlier, in September 2019, Martin J. Gruenberg, a member of the FDIC Board of Directors, had said in a statement that he will vote against this proposal, as "this would remove an important prudential protection from the bank and expose the bank to one of the most significant risks identified in the financial crisis."
Comment Due Date: December 09, 2019
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Swap Margin Rule, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Margin Requirements, LIBOR, Derivatives, Initial Margin, Proportionality, Legacy Swaps, US Agencies
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Summary of Plenary Meeting in Paris
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.