The Bank of England (BoE) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are seeking views, until June 30, 2022, on issues with respect to the usability of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) held by banks.
The Basel Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, requires banks to hold a large enough stock of HQLA to meet their payment obligations in the case of a severe short-term stress. However, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) identified HQLA usability as an issue that may warrant further consideration, as part of their assessments of lessons learned from the COVID-19 stress. This discussion paper (DP1/22) is therefore also intended to inform BoE and PRA’s contribution to the ongoing work by BCBS on the evaluation of Basel III reforms. The discussion paper seeks views from from banks, wider market participants, and other stakeholders to improve understanding of of the ways in which banks feel constrained in their ability to draw on their stock of HQLA to meet unusual liquidity demands, the factors affecting this, and the improvements that can be made to allow banks to utilize their HQLA stock. The paper summarizes the prudential liquidity framework, offers evidence on the willingness and ability of banks to allow their stocks of HQLA to fall, and seeks views on the following aspects of HQLA usability:
- To what extent do banks feel constrained in their ability to draw on their stock of HQLA to meet unusual liquidity demands?
- To what extent is it desirable that banks feel more able to draw on their HQLA and how this could be achieved?
- How do the internal liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) targets of banks affect HQLA usability? To what extent would it be feasible and appropriate for banks to adjust or tailor internal targets for different scenarios?
- To what extent did authorities’ communications around HQLA usability during the COVID-19 stress support banks in using their HQLA?
- How much are banks concerned about regulatory reactions to initial falls in LCR and how much about potential regulatory views on the timeline for rebuilding HQLA stocks?
- What may be driving a potential stigma around banks allowing LCRs to fall?
- To what extent is it challenging for market participants to interpret the signals they receive from LCR-related disclosures when banks are facing liquidity pressures?
- What impact do regulatory liquidity disclosures have on HQLA usability and how might regulatory liquidity disclosures be improved?
- How do factors that drive LCR volatility contribute to concerns around HQLA usability?
- How does the practice of spot LCR disclosures affect HQLA usability in times of liquidity pressure?
- What would be the potential costs and benefits of changing prudential regulatory LCR disclosures to be more in line with the Basel (typically 90-day) averaging approach?
Related Link: Discussion Paper
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Basel, ALM, Liquidity Risk, HQLA, LCR, Disclosures, Covid-19, HQLA Usability, BoE, PRA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleBIS Hub Develops Prototype Supervisory Analytics Platform
Next ArticleFSB Set Out Work Deliverables for 2022
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its work program for 2023 as well as the technical package for phase 3 of version 3.2 of its reporting framework.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) announced a pilot climate scenario analysis exercise for six largest banks in the U.S.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that studies impact of fintech lending on credit access for small businesses in U.S.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS8/22 to amend the Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (CRR) Part of the PRA Rulebook and update the supervisory statement SS7/13 titled "Definition of capital (CRR firms).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched the EU-wide transparency exercise for 2022, with results of the exercise expected to be published at the beginning of December, along with the annual Risk Assessment Report.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) welcomed the adoption of the review of the Capital Requirements Regulation, or CRR, also known as the "CRR quick-fix."
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted the Delegated Regulation 2022/1622, which sets out the regulatory technical standards to specify the countries that constitute advanced economies for the purpose of specifying risk-weights for the sensitivities to equity.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying and, where relevant, calibrating the minimum performance-related triggers for simple.
The European Central Bank (ECB) is undertaking the integrated reporting framework (IReF) project to integrate statistical requirements for banks into a standardized reporting framework that would be applicable across the euro area and adopted by authorities in other EU member states.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been awarded the top European Standard for its environmental performance under the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).