The Bank of England (BoE) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) are seeking views, until June 30, 2022, on issues with respect to the usability of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) held by banks.
The Basel Liquidity Coverage Ratio, or LCR, requires banks to hold a large enough stock of HQLA to meet their payment obligations in the case of a severe short-term stress. However, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB) identified HQLA usability as an issue that may warrant further consideration, as part of their assessments of lessons learned from the COVID-19 stress. This discussion paper (DP1/22) is therefore also intended to inform BoE and PRA’s contribution to the ongoing work by BCBS on the evaluation of Basel III reforms. The discussion paper seeks views from from banks, wider market participants, and other stakeholders to improve understanding of of the ways in which banks feel constrained in their ability to draw on their stock of HQLA to meet unusual liquidity demands, the factors affecting this, and the improvements that can be made to allow banks to utilize their HQLA stock. The paper summarizes the prudential liquidity framework, offers evidence on the willingness and ability of banks to allow their stocks of HQLA to fall, and seeks views on the following aspects of HQLA usability:
- To what extent do banks feel constrained in their ability to draw on their stock of HQLA to meet unusual liquidity demands?
- To what extent is it desirable that banks feel more able to draw on their HQLA and how this could be achieved?
- How do the internal liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) targets of banks affect HQLA usability? To what extent would it be feasible and appropriate for banks to adjust or tailor internal targets for different scenarios?
- To what extent did authorities’ communications around HQLA usability during the COVID-19 stress support banks in using their HQLA?
- How much are banks concerned about regulatory reactions to initial falls in LCR and how much about potential regulatory views on the timeline for rebuilding HQLA stocks?
- What may be driving a potential stigma around banks allowing LCRs to fall?
- To what extent is it challenging for market participants to interpret the signals they receive from LCR-related disclosures when banks are facing liquidity pressures?
- What impact do regulatory liquidity disclosures have on HQLA usability and how might regulatory liquidity disclosures be improved?
- How do factors that drive LCR volatility contribute to concerns around HQLA usability?
- How does the practice of spot LCR disclosures affect HQLA usability in times of liquidity pressure?
- What would be the potential costs and benefits of changing prudential regulatory LCR disclosures to be more in line with the Basel (typically 90-day) averaging approach?
Related Link: Discussion Paper
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Basel, ALM, Liquidity Risk, HQLA, LCR, Disclosures, Covid-19, HQLA Usability, BoE, PRA
Previous ArticleBIS Hub Develops Prototype Supervisory Analytics Platform
Next ArticleFSB Set Out Work Deliverables for 2022
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”