Featured Product

    EBA Outlines Reporting and Disclosure Expectations Amid COVID Outbreak

    March 31, 2020

    In response to the impact of COVID-19 outbreak, EBA published statements that provide guidance on the use of flexibility in supervisory reporting, clarify expectations in relation to dividend and remuneration policies, and outline the necessary measures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. EBA provides details on its call for competent authorities to offer leeway on reporting dates, urging one-month flexibility for reports with remittance dates between March and the end of May 2020. However, there has been no delay for reporting in accordance with the reporting framework version 2.9. EBA also called for flexibility in assessing deadlines of Pillar 3 disclosures of institutions and decided, in coordination with BCBS, to cancel the Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) based on June 2020 data.

    In its statement on supervisory reporting, EBA highlighted that, in general, institutions should be allowed up to one additional month for submitting the required data. Each competent and resolution authority should clarify the precise terms for institutions in their jurisdiction. Such exception should not apply to

    • Information on the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) and the Additional Liquidity Monitoring Metrics (ALMM) and to the data sets identified as priority by the competent or resolution authority. These data should be reported in accordance with the deadlines specified in the applicable reporting standard.
    • Reporting for resolution planning purposes. Information on the liability structure of an institution, including intra-group financial connections, should be reported to resolution authorities by the set date in the applicable reporting standard (April 30, 2020 or earlier if set by the resolution authority).

    From March 2020 onward, the reporting framework version 2.9 will gradually replace its predecessor version 2.8. EBA is of the view that prolonging the application of version 2.8 would not provide a significant relief to institutions or authorities. Reporting in accordance with version 2.9 should therefore start, as envisaged by the adopted Implementing Act amending Regulation, with the reference date March 31, 2020.  EBA also e encouraged competent authorities to be flexible when assessing the institutions’ compliance with the deadlines for the publication of their Pillar 3 reports. The statement adds that the competent authorities and institutions should assess the need for additional Pillar 3 disclosures on prudential information that may be necessary to properly convey the risk profile of the institution in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, in its statement on actions to mitigate financial crime risks during the COVID-19 pandemic, EBA calls on competent authorities to support ongoing efforts of financial institutions by sharing information on emerging money laundering and terrorist financing risks, setting clear regulatory expectations, and using supervisory tools flexibly.

    In its statement of dividend distribution and remuneration policies, EBA emphasizes that the capital relief resulting from the measures adopted by competent authorities in response to COVID-19 crisis are to be used to finance the corporate and household sectors and not to increase the distribution of dividends or make share buybacks for the purpose of remunerating shareholders. EBA, acknowledging that some banks have already communicated a postponement of their decisions, urges all banks to refrain from dividend distribution or share buybacks. Banks should revert to their competent authorities in case they consider themselves legally required to pay-out dividends or make share buybacks. EBA also considers that ensuring the efficient and prudent allocation of capital within banking groups is crucial and should be monitored by competent authorities. Furthermore, competent authorities should ask banks to review their remuneration policies, practices, and awards to ensure that they are consistent with, and promote, sound and effective risk management, also reflecting the current economic situation. Remuneration and, in particular, its variable portion should be set at a conservative level. To achieve an appropriate alignment with risks stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic a larger part of the variable remuneration could be deferred for a longer period and a larger proportion could be paid out in equity instruments.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Reporting, Framework 2.9, Pillar 3, LCR, QIS, Resolution Planning, Disclosures, BCBS, EBA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EC Publishes Regulations Supplementing Investment Firms Directive

    The European Commission (EC) published three Delegated Regulations (2021/2153, 2021/2154, and 2021/2155) to supplement the Investment Firms Directive (IFD or Directive 2019/2034).

    December 07, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Report Examines Trends in Non-Bank Intermediation in Americas

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that presents results of the sixth non-bank financial intermediation monitoring exercise in the Americas.

    December 06, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Discusses Regulatory Approach for Non-Bank Intermediation

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published the December issue of the Quarterly Review, which analyzes the non-bank financial intermediation mechanisms that could undermine financial stability.

    December 06, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Calls for Vendor Input for Data Collection Transformation Program

    The Bank of England (BoE) opened the Alternative Liquidity Facility, or ALF, for deposits from the participating UK-based Islamic banks for the first time.

    December 03, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Sets LAC for D-SIBs, Proposes to Enhance Crisis Preparedness

    APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Standards on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched three consultations on technical aspects of the revised framework capturing interest rate risks for banking book (IRRBB) positions, with the comment period ending on April 04, 2022.

    December 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC to Review Macro-Prudential Rules while ESRB Assesses Policy Stance

    The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Sets Out List of Banks for Mandatory Basel III Monitoring Exercise

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the sample of banks for the mandatory Basel III monitoring exercise, which will refer to the December 2021 data.

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Revises Complex Institution Liquidity Monitoring Report for Banks

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) is adopting a proposal to revise and extend for three years the Complex Institution Liquidity Monitoring Report (FR 2052a) for banks.

    December 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Good Practices for Crisis Management Groups

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.

    November 30, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7758