The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that discusses the impact of COVID-19 on market structure as well as the associated implications for financial stability.
The report examines whether the COVID-19 pandemic changed the ways in which individuals and firms engage with innovative financial service providers and traditional financial incumbents. The report outlines the types of actions (related to financial stability, competition, data privacy and governance issues) authorities have taken during the pandemic that may impact market structure and the role of different firms in providing digital financial services. The report also stresses the importance of cooperation between regulatory and supervisory authorities, including those charged with overseeing the bank and non-bank sectors, and where relevant, with competition and data protection authorities. The report discusses:
- bigtech and fintech firms’ expansion into financial services that could bring benefits such as improved cost efficiencies and wider financial inclusion for previously underserved groups. It also cautions over the potential for market dominance
- negative financial stability implications from dependence on a limited number of bigtech and fintech providers in some markets, the complexity and opacity of their partnership activities, and potential incentives for risk taking by incumbent financial institutions to preserve profitability
- consumer protection risks from greater dependency on technology as well as the impact of operational vulnerability stemming from the limited number of cloud service providers
- need to address data gaps that hamper the assessment of bigtech firms’ financial risks and systemic importance
- benefits from accelerated digitalization of financial services during the pandemic and whether those observed changes may be structural or revert back to pre-pandemic levels once conditions normalize
- parallel international work on third-party dependencies of the financial sector, for instance, in cloud computing
The report concludes that the pandemic has accelerated the trend toward digitalization of retail financial services. The growth of bigtech firms in particular may give greater urgency to financial stability issues previously discussed, such as the potential for greater systemic importance of new players that may not be subject to financial regulation. This underscores the need to address data gaps that hamper the assessment of the financial risks and systemic importance of bigtech firms. Such data gaps make it difficult for authorities to decide whether and how to include bigtech firms in the regulatory perimeter.
Keywords: International, Banking, Fintech, Covid-19, Bigtech, Financial Stability, Data Privacy, Governance, Regtech, Suptech, Systemic Risk, Digitalization, API, Cloud Service Providers, FSB
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleEIOPA Issues Recommendations Post Insurance Stress Tests
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.