Featured Product

    BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank Regulation

    March 19, 2019

    BCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision. The Basel Committee conducted this survey among its members and those of the Basel Consultative Group (BCG), in an effort to take stock of the proportionality measures in place across jurisdictions.

    The following are the key findings of the survey:

    • The majority of respondents to the survey apply proportionality measures in their jurisdictions. In most cases, such measures are applied to banks that represent a relatively small share of total banking assets in the relevant jurisdiction, although there is a fair degree of heterogeneity.
    • Jurisdictions rely on a number of determinants in identifying proportionality thresholds/segments. These include a wide number of balance sheet metrics and differentiation by bank business models. In most cases, these indicators are coupled with supervisory judgment when determining the scope of banks subject to different requirements.
    • Most jurisdictions apply some form of proportionality related to capital and liquidity requirements. These generally take the form of a modified/simpler version of the existing Basel standards, particularly for the more complex risk categories, or an exemption from such requirements for certain banks.
    • Jurisdictions similarly apply proportionate reporting and disclosure requirements, with some banks subject to less onerous requirements and submission frequencies.
    • Most jurisdictions also apply a proportionate approach to their supervisory practices, including the intensity of on- and off-site examinations, requirements related to risk management controls and governance, and supervisory stress tests.

    The majority of the respondents indicated that they have future plans related to proportionality, while just under half of BCG respondents indicated likewise. These include plans to review the existing proportionality regimes, including the scope for developing simpler approaches for capital and liquidity requirements, reducing reporting and disclosure requirements, and reviewing the scope of banks subject to proportionality measures, and the associated threshold determinants. Some jurisdictions noted that they plan to apply a proportionate approach to supervision. A few jurisdictions that do not apply proportionality measures indicated that they plan to consider introducing a proportionality regime in the future.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Basel III, Proportionality, Banking Supervision, Banking Regulation, BCBS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    UK Regulators Announce Measures to Address Impact of COVID-19

    UK Regulatory Authorities published statements and guidance addressed to financial entities on dealing with the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA and Industry Request Delay in Timeline for Initial Margin Rules

    Considering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, ISDA submitted a letter on behalf of 21 industry associations and their members requesting BCBS, IOSCO, and global regulators to suspend the current timeline for the initial margin phase-in.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA, FRC, and PRA Issue Joint Statement to Address Impact of COVID-19

    In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, FCA, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), and PRA have announced a series of actions and made statements to support the continued functioning of capital markets in the UK.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Rule Corrects Regulation Supplementing Solvency II Directive

    EC published the EU Delegated Regulation 2020/442, which corrects the EU Delegated Regulation 2015/35 that supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED and FFIEC Offer Reporting Relief to Institutions Due to COVID-19

    FED and FFIEC announced regulatory reporting relief to financial institutions due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ESMA Clarify Accounting Implications of COVID-19 Measures

    EBA and ESMA issued statements to address certain accounting implications of the economic support and relief measures adopted by EU member states in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IOSCO and Securities Regulators Coordinate Responses to COVID-19

    IOSCO members are cooperating closely on their responses to the COVID-19-related disruption in capital markets.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Issue Interim MMLF Rule, FED Updates FR Y-14 Forms

    In an effort to mitigate the impact of economic disruptions due to the COVID-19 outbreak, Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF) was launched in the US to enhance the liquidity and functioning of money markets and to support the economy.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Updates List of Countercyclical Capital Buffers in March 2020

    ESRB updated the list of countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) rates applicable in countries in the Eurosystem.

    March 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FHFA Amends Stress Testing Rule for Regulated Entities

    FHFA adopted a final rule that amends the stress testing rule, in line with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

    March 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4890