SARB Directive Addresses Issuance of Certain AT1 Capital Instruments
SARB published the Directive D2/2021 that explains the stance of the Prudential Authority on the South African banks efforts to seek to include a contingent payment provision in the terms and conditions of their additional tier 1, or AT1, capital instruments. The Prudential Authority is not opposed to banks including the contingent "must-pay" clause in the terms and conditions of both local and foreign currency denominated additional tier 1 instruments. However, banks that elect to utilize the contingent "must-pay" clause as part of the additional tier 1 instruments’ terms and conditions must note that the Prudential Authority will not approve the issuance of additional tier 1 instruments, unless it is also stated in the terms of the instrument that, in the event that the point of non-viability is triggered by the Prudent Authority, such a decision would not constitute a capital disqualification event.
The Directive states that inclusion of the contingent "must-pay" clause shall neither amend nor revise the current terms and conditions of additional tier 1 instruments, in line with the terms of regulation 38(11)(b) of the Regulations or the guidance provided in Guidance Note 6 of 2017, as they relate to additional tier 1 capital. Therefore, the rights of the holders of the additional tier 1 instruments and the powers of the Prudential Authority, should a capital disqualification event occur and the contingent "must-pay" clause is invoked as a result of the occurrence of a capital disqualification event, shall be fully disclosed within the contractual pricing supplement or prospectus of the instrument. The issuance of all additional tier 1 instruments is subject to the prior written approval of the Prudential Authority, as per the terms of regulation 38(11)(b)(ii) of the Regulations. The Directive also sets out the requirements to be met for when the Authority will consider an application for approval for the issuance of additional tier 1 instruments.
- Coupons that are payable under the contingent "must-pay" clause must only be the coupons accruing after the instrument has been disqualified from regulatory capital in its entirety.
- Coupon payment obligation becomes mandatory on each interest payment date once the instrument has been derecognized in full from qualifying capital.
- Total value of additional tier 1 instruments with a contingent "must-pay" clause shall be limited to 25% of the qualifying tier 1 capital and reserve funds; this limit would be assessed and enforced at the time of each application in terms of section 79 of the Banks Act, Act No 94 of 1990.
Related Links
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Prudential Authority, Must-Pay Clause, Additional Tier 1 Capital, Basel, SARB
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
MFSA on Application of Sustainable Finance Disclosure RegulationNext Article
SARB Updates Requirements for BA Returns for BanksRelated Articles
EBA Finalizes Templates for One-Off Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
EBA Mulls Inclusion of Environmental & Social Risks to Pillar 1 Rules
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently published a report that recommends enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, under the prudential rules, to capture environmental and social risks.
BCBS Consults on Disclosure of Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks
As a follow on from its prudential standard on the treatment of crypto-asset exposures, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed disclosure requirements for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
BCBS and EBA Publish Results of Basel III Monitoring Exercise
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise.
PRA Updates Timeline for Final Basel III Rules, Issues Other Updates
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) recently issued a few regulatory updates for banks, with the updated Basel implementation timelines being the key among them.
US Treasury Sets Out Principles for Net-Zero Financing
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has recently set out the principles for net-zero financing and investment.
EC Launches Survey on G7 Principles on Generative AI
The European Commission (EC) launched a stakeholder survey on the draft International Guiding Principles for organizations developing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
