SARB published the Directive D2/2021 that explains the stance of the Prudential Authority on the South African banks efforts to seek to include a contingent payment provision in the terms and conditions of their additional tier 1, or AT1, capital instruments. The Prudential Authority is not opposed to banks including the contingent "must-pay" clause in the terms and conditions of both local and foreign currency denominated additional tier 1 instruments. However, banks that elect to utilize the contingent "must-pay" clause as part of the additional tier 1 instruments’ terms and conditions must note that the Prudential Authority will not approve the issuance of additional tier 1 instruments, unless it is also stated in the terms of the instrument that, in the event that the point of non-viability is triggered by the Prudent Authority, such a decision would not constitute a capital disqualification event.
The Directive states that inclusion of the contingent "must-pay" clause shall neither amend nor revise the current terms and conditions of additional tier 1 instruments, in line with the terms of regulation 38(11)(b) of the Regulations or the guidance provided in Guidance Note 6 of 2017, as they relate to additional tier 1 capital. Therefore, the rights of the holders of the additional tier 1 instruments and the powers of the Prudential Authority, should a capital disqualification event occur and the contingent "must-pay" clause is invoked as a result of the occurrence of a capital disqualification event, shall be fully disclosed within the contractual pricing supplement or prospectus of the instrument. The issuance of all additional tier 1 instruments is subject to the prior written approval of the Prudential Authority, as per the terms of regulation 38(11)(b)(ii) of the Regulations. The Directive also sets out the requirements to be met for when the Authority will consider an application for approval for the issuance of additional tier 1 instruments.
- Coupons that are payable under the contingent "must-pay" clause must only be the coupons accruing after the instrument has been disqualified from regulatory capital in its entirety.
- Coupon payment obligation becomes mandatory on each interest payment date once the instrument has been derecognized in full from qualifying capital.
- Total value of additional tier 1 instruments with a contingent "must-pay" clause shall be limited to 25% of the qualifying tier 1 capital and reserve funds; this limit would be assessed and enforced at the time of each application in terms of section 79 of the Banks Act, Act No 94 of 1990.
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Prudential Authority, Must-Pay Clause, Additional Tier 1 Capital, Basel, SARB
Previous ArticleMFSA on Application of Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
Next ArticleSARB Updates Requirements for BA Returns for Banks
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.