EIOPA responded to the EC consultation on a new digital finance strategy for Europe. In its response, EIOPA highlighted that a sound approach to financial innovation should strike a balance between enhancing financial innovation and ensuring well-functioning consumer protection and financial stability frameworks. EIOPA espouses further improvements in the areas of fit-for-purpose insurance regulations, ethical and transparent use of data, a common cyber incident reporting framework, and data standardization.
In its response, EIOPA emphasizes that insurance regulation must be fit for purpose. For this reason, it is crucial to understand how new technologies and business models drive new risks and opportunities. Improvements and clarifications can be introduced, for example, on paper requirements by default, on the definition of insurance, and on outsourcing requirements. Additionally, there must be a fair, ethical and transparent use of data. Data is a key driver of financial innovations such as those enabled by artificial intelligence. Data analytics governance frameworks are crucial to engender trust and ground the use of data in common ethical principles. This is an area where stakeholders have called for more guidance, so EIOPA is working with an Expert Group on Digital Ethics in insurance to bring further clarity on fairness, explainability, and governance aspects of artificial intelligence and similar use cases. EIOPA also states that access to relevant datasets is critical for insurance. In this area:
- EIOPA has recently started a broader discussion with stakeholders on possible balanced, forward-looking, and secure approaches to Open Insurance and its risks and benefits to the insurance industry, consumers, and supervisors. This work is ongoing and EIOPA sees some potential for the sector if handled sensitively. Different Open Insurance solutions could further facilitate the uptake of suptech.
- EIOPA encourages EC to promote the interoperability of applications and portability of data between different platforms (that is, reduce lock-in effects) and to improve the power of consumers to switch between providers.
- EIOPA explains that a common cyber incident reporting framework is critical for sharing knowledge about incidents and to encourage the development and growth of sound underwriting practices.
- EIOPA believes it is critical that future standardization is built on what has already been achieved. EIOPA has extensive experience in this regard and is ready to be closely involved in future discussions on data standardization. Innovation and digitalization could also benefit from a wider adoption of existing standards (for example, the Legal Entity Identifier). The elements EIOPA considers as useful in terms of standardization are metadata management including schema and variables, data formats and common data models, and data exchange protocols and APIs.
- EIOPA has not yet done detailed work on regtech; however, it has developed a suptech strategy. One of the areas commonly referred to when addressing regtech is supervisory reporting. In this case, the lack of harmonization of EU rules, namely consistency across definitions, formats, and processes within the financial services reporting legislation, needs to be achieved to contribute to further development of such tools. EIOPA considers that translating financial services legislation into machine-readable and executable reporting requirements could benefit both, the reporting entity and the supervisor. It is likely that the long-term future compliance with regulatory and reporting requirements will be largely algorithm/code based.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Fintech, Regtech, Suptech, Cyber Risk, Reporting, Solvency II, Machine-Readable Regulations, Digital Finance Strategy, EC, EIOPA
The European Commission (EC) published three Delegated Regulations (2021/2153, 2021/2154, and 2021/2155) to supplement the Investment Firms Directive (IFD or Directive 2019/2034).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that presents results of the sixth non-bank financial intermediation monitoring exercise in the Americas.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published the December issue of the Quarterly Review, which analyzes the non-bank financial intermediation mechanisms that could undermine financial stability.
The Bank of England (BoE) opened the Alternative Liquidity Facility, or ALF, for deposits from the participating UK-based Islamic banks for the first time.
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched three consultations on technical aspects of the revised framework capturing interest rate risks for banking book (IRRBB) positions, with the comment period ending on April 04, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the sample of banks for the mandatory Basel III monitoring exercise, which will refer to the December 2021 data.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) is adopting a proposal to revise and extend for three years the Complex Institution Liquidity Monitoring Report (FR 2052a) for banks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.