Featured Product

    BCBS Reviews Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements

    June 24, 2019

    BCBS published a working paper that assesses the costs and benefits of stronger capital and liquidity requirements. The paper finds that the net macroeconomic benefits of capital requirements are positive over a wide range of capital levels. The paper also suggests a set of issues that warrant further monitoring and research. These issues include the link between capital and the cost and probability of crises, accounting for the effects of liquidity regulations, resolution regimes and countercyclical capital buffers, and the impact of regulation on loan quantities.

    The range of estimates for the theoretically optimal level of capital requirements—where marginal benefits equal marginal costs—is likely either similar or higher than was originally estimated by the Basel Committee. This conclusion is, however, subject to a number of important considerations:

    • First, estimates of optimal capital are sensitive to a number of assumptions and design choices. For example, the literature differs in judgments made about the permanence of crisis effects as well as assumptions about the efficacy of post crisis reforms, such as liquidity regulations and bank resolution regimes, in reducing the probability and costs of future banking crisis. In some cases, these judgments can offset the upward tendency in the range of optimal capital.
    • Second, differences in (net) benefit estimates can reflect different conditioning assumptions such as starting levels of capital or default thresholds (the capital ratio at which firms are assumed to fail) when estimating the impact of capital in reducing crisis probabilities.
    • Finally, the estimates are based on capital ratios that are measured in different units. For example, some studies provide optimal capital estimates in risk-weighted ratios, others in leverage ratios. Additionally, across the risk-weighted ratio estimates, the definition of capital and risk-weighted assets (RWAs) can also differ (for example, tangible common equity or tier 1 or common equity tier 1 capital; Basel II RWAs vs. Basel III measures of RWAs).

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Liquidity Requirements, Liquidity Risk, CET 1, Basel III, BCBS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Publishes Proposal to Increase Transparency of Banking Data

    APRA proposed to substantially increase the volume and breadth of data it makes publicly available on authorized deposit-taking institutions, including banks, credit unions, and building societies.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Consults on Guide to Internal Controls for Credit Rating Agencies

    ESMA launched a consultation on the guidelines on internal controls for credit rating agencies (CRAs).

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Finalizes Directive and Prudential Rules for Investment Firms

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, the Directive (2019/2034) and Regulation (2019/2033) on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Revises Guideline on Principles for Management of Liquidity Risk

    OSFI finalized Guideline B-6 on the principles for the management of liquidity risk.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Consults on Framework to Manage Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

    PRA published a consultation paper CP30/19 that sets out proposals to modernize the regulatory framework on outsourcing and third-party risk management.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE, PRA, and FCA Consult to Strengthen Operational Resilience

    BoE, PRA, and FCA published a shared policy summary and coordinated consultation papers on new requirements to strengthen operational resilience in the financial services sector.

    December 05, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Amends Rule on Mapping of External Credit Assessment Institutions

    EC published the implementing regulation (EU) 2019/2028, which amends Regulation 2016/1799, regarding the mapping tables specifying correspondence between the credit risk assessments of external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs) and the credit quality steps set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Second Part of Advice on Implementation of Basel III in EU

    EBA published the second part of its advice on the implementation of Basel III in EU, which complements the report published on August 05, 2019.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Approves European Council Proposal on CCP Recovery and Resolution

    EU ambassadors approved the position of European Council on a proposed framework for clearing houses and their authorities to prepare for and deal with financial difficulties.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Guideline on Foreign Bank Branch Deposit Requirements

    OSFI released the final version of Guideline A-10 on foreign bank branch deposit requirements, along with guideline impact analysis statement.

    December 04, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4268