Featured Product

    BCBS Reviews Impact of Stronger Capital and Liquidity Requirements

    June 24, 2019

    BCBS published a working paper that assesses the costs and benefits of stronger capital and liquidity requirements. The paper finds that the net macroeconomic benefits of capital requirements are positive over a wide range of capital levels. The paper also suggests a set of issues that warrant further monitoring and research. These issues include the link between capital and the cost and probability of crises, accounting for the effects of liquidity regulations, resolution regimes and countercyclical capital buffers, and the impact of regulation on loan quantities.

    The range of estimates for the theoretically optimal level of capital requirements—where marginal benefits equal marginal costs—is likely either similar or higher than was originally estimated by the Basel Committee. This conclusion is, however, subject to a number of important considerations:

    • First, estimates of optimal capital are sensitive to a number of assumptions and design choices. For example, the literature differs in judgments made about the permanence of crisis effects as well as assumptions about the efficacy of post crisis reforms, such as liquidity regulations and bank resolution regimes, in reducing the probability and costs of future banking crisis. In some cases, these judgments can offset the upward tendency in the range of optimal capital.
    • Second, differences in (net) benefit estimates can reflect different conditioning assumptions such as starting levels of capital or default thresholds (the capital ratio at which firms are assumed to fail) when estimating the impact of capital in reducing crisis probabilities.
    • Finally, the estimates are based on capital ratios that are measured in different units. For example, some studies provide optimal capital estimates in risk-weighted ratios, others in leverage ratios. Additionally, across the risk-weighted ratio estimates, the definition of capital and risk-weighted assets (RWAs) can also differ (for example, tangible common equity or tier 1 or common equity tier 1 capital; Basel II RWAs vs. Basel III measures of RWAs).

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Liquidity Requirements, Liquidity Risk, CET 1, Basel III, BCBS

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Announces Deferral of Capital Reform Implementation

    APRA announced that it is deferring the scheduled implementation of Basel III reforms in Australia by one year.

    March 30, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IFRS Publishes Statement on Its Work During the COVID-19 Crisis

    IFRS, in its statement, emphasized that it shares global concerns about the impact of COVID–19 and is supporting its stakeholders by reconsidering timelines of its meetings and publications, providing information on the application of IFRS 9 on financial instruments, and offering calendar updates on ongoing activities.

    March 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Announce Changes to SA-CCR and CECL Rules Due to COVID-19

    In light of the recent disruptions in economic conditions due to the COVID-19 outbreak, US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) announced two actions to allow banking organizations to continue lending to households and businesses.

    March 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IAIS Adjusts Work Program to Address Impact of COVID-19 on Insurers

    Considering the impact of COVID-19 outbreak, IAIS announced initial adjustments to its work program to provide operational relief to its member supervisors, insurers, and other stakeholders.

    March 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Announces Regulatory Adjustments to Support COVID-19 Efforts

    OSFI published three targeted industry letters that announce a series of regulatory adjustments to support the financial and operational resilience of federally regulated banks, insurers, and private pension plans in the light of COVID-19.

    March 27, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    UK Regulators Announce Measures to Address Impact of COVID-19

    UK Regulatory Authorities published statements and guidance addressed to financial entities on dealing with the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA and Industry Request Delay in Timeline for Initial Margin Rules

    Considering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, ISDA submitted a letter on behalf of 21 industry associations and their members requesting BCBS, IOSCO, and global regulators to suspend the current timeline for the initial margin phase-in.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA, FRC, and PRA Issue Joint Statement to Address Impact of COVID-19

    In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, FCA, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), and PRA have announced a series of actions and made statements to support the continued functioning of capital markets in the UK.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Rule Corrects Regulation Supplementing Solvency II Directive

    EC published the EU Delegated Regulation 2020/442, which corrects the EU Delegated Regulation 2015/35 that supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED and FFIEC Offer Reporting Relief to Institutions Due to COVID-19

    FED and FFIEC announced regulatory reporting relief to financial institutions due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4900