PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter from Sam Woods, its Deputy Governor and CEO, to update the March guidance on treatment of COVID-19-related payment deferrals under IFRS 9 and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The letter, which is addressed to the chief executive officers of deposit takers in UK, is in response to the updated FCA guidance on retail mortgage payment deferrals. The aim of the updated guidance is to address the treatment of exits from the initial payment deferrals.
Much of the March guidance related to payment holidays, moratoria, or deferrals (collectively, payment deferrals). The first payment deferrals are now coming to an end and earlier this week the FCA published an updated guidance on how lenders should treat retail mortgage borrowers at the end of the initial deferral period. As a consequence, firms are assessing the capital and accounting treatment of the various ways in which those initial payment deferrals might end. The purpose of this letter is to update the March guidance to address exits from initial payment deferrals. The guidance in this letter is considered to be consistent with IFRS and CRR. However, PRA also recognizes that it is the responsibility of firms to satisfy themselves that they have prepared their annual and interim financial reports in accordance with the applicable reporting frameworks and for auditors to reach their own audit or review conclusions about those reports. Similarly, it is for firms to ensure they comply with the requirements of CRR.
The Annex to this letter sets out the detailed guidance, which can be summarized as follows:
- When there has been a payment deferral, counting of days past due should be based on the agreed schedule for the purposes of the expected credit loss (ECL) backstops and for the CRR definition of default. However, loans that are not past due can still have suffered a significant increase in credit risk or SICR, credit impairment, or default.
- Eligibility for, and use of, COVID-19 related initial and further payment deferrals taken up in accordance with the FCA guidance on the subject does not on its own automatically result in a loan (a) being regarded as having suffered a significant increase in credit risk or being credit-impaired for ECL, or (b) triggering a default under CRR. Firms will, therefore, need to consider other indicators to determine the appropriate treatment. For example, for CRR purposes, firms will need to assess whether the deferral should be considered a distressed restructuring; in cases where it is likely to result in a diminished financial obligation, this may be an indication of default.
- Firms are likely to have limited borrower-specific information to make the determinations on an individual borrower basis. Firms will, therefore, need to make holistic assessments that look beyond past-due information and use of payment deferrals to treat such loans appropriately for accounting and regulatory purposes.
- It is not envisaged that these holistic assessments for accounting and CRR purposes will be made at the time when a payment deferral is taken up, as the FCA guidance does not require such information to be available at that time. These assessments are expected to be made subsequently and be based on the information available at the next and subsequent reporting dates.
PRA recognizes that distinguishing between different types of payment or other financial difficulty is not easy in the current environment, given the extraordinary level of economic uncertainty and the complex interactions between various public-sector and private-sector COVID-19 related support measures. PRA encourages firms to make well-balanced and consistent decisions that take into account the information they have regarding the borrower, the potential impact of COVID-19, and the unprecedented level of support provided by governments and central banks domestically and internationally to protect the economy.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, IFRS 9, ECL, COVID-19, CRR, Credit Risk, Loan Moratorium, SICR, Guidance, FCA, PRA
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).
US Agencies (Farm Credit Administration, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) finalized changes to the swap margin rule to facilitate implementation of prudent risk management strategies at banks and other entities with significant swap activities.
PRA published a letter that builds on the expectations set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/19) on enhancing banks' and insurers' approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change.
EBA finalized the guidelines on treatment of structural foreign-exchange (FX) positions under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
FSB published a statement on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global benchmark transition.
IAIS published the list of Internationally Active Insurance Groups (IAIGs) publicly disclosed by group-wide supervisors.
FED has temporarily revised the reporting form on consolidated financial statements for holding companies (FR Y-9C; OMB No. 7100-0128).
EC launched a consultation on the review of the key elements of Solvency II Directive, with the comment period ending on October 21, 2020.