PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter from Sam Woods, its Deputy Governor and CEO, to update the March guidance on treatment of COVID-19-related payment deferrals under IFRS 9 and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The letter, which is addressed to the chief executive officers of deposit takers in UK, is in response to the updated FCA guidance on retail mortgage payment deferrals. The aim of the updated guidance is to address the treatment of exits from the initial payment deferrals.
Much of the March guidance related to payment holidays, moratoria, or deferrals (collectively, payment deferrals). The first payment deferrals are now coming to an end and earlier this week the FCA published an updated guidance on how lenders should treat retail mortgage borrowers at the end of the initial deferral period. As a consequence, firms are assessing the capital and accounting treatment of the various ways in which those initial payment deferrals might end. The purpose of this letter is to update the March guidance to address exits from initial payment deferrals. The guidance in this letter is considered to be consistent with IFRS and CRR. However, PRA also recognizes that it is the responsibility of firms to satisfy themselves that they have prepared their annual and interim financial reports in accordance with the applicable reporting frameworks and for auditors to reach their own audit or review conclusions about those reports. Similarly, it is for firms to ensure they comply with the requirements of CRR.
The Annex to this letter sets out the detailed guidance, which can be summarized as follows:
- When there has been a payment deferral, counting of days past due should be based on the agreed schedule for the purposes of the expected credit loss (ECL) backstops and for the CRR definition of default. However, loans that are not past due can still have suffered a significant increase in credit risk or SICR, credit impairment, or default.
- Eligibility for, and use of, COVID-19 related initial and further payment deferrals taken up in accordance with the FCA guidance on the subject does not on its own automatically result in a loan (a) being regarded as having suffered a significant increase in credit risk or being credit-impaired for ECL, or (b) triggering a default under CRR. Firms will, therefore, need to consider other indicators to determine the appropriate treatment. For example, for CRR purposes, firms will need to assess whether the deferral should be considered a distressed restructuring; in cases where it is likely to result in a diminished financial obligation, this may be an indication of default.
- Firms are likely to have limited borrower-specific information to make the determinations on an individual borrower basis. Firms will, therefore, need to make holistic assessments that look beyond past-due information and use of payment deferrals to treat such loans appropriately for accounting and regulatory purposes.
- It is not envisaged that these holistic assessments for accounting and CRR purposes will be made at the time when a payment deferral is taken up, as the FCA guidance does not require such information to be available at that time. These assessments are expected to be made subsequently and be based on the information available at the next and subsequent reporting dates.
PRA recognizes that distinguishing between different types of payment or other financial difficulty is not easy in the current environment, given the extraordinary level of economic uncertainty and the complex interactions between various public-sector and private-sector COVID-19 related support measures. PRA encourages firms to make well-balanced and consistent decisions that take into account the information they have regarding the borrower, the potential impact of COVID-19, and the unprecedented level of support provided by governments and central banks domestically and internationally to protect the economy.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, IFRS 9, ECL, COVID-19, CRR, Credit Risk, Loan Moratorium, SICR, Guidance, FCA, PRA
Previous ArticleEC Approves Prolongation of Irish Credit Union Resolution Scheme
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)