IMF published its staff report under the 2018 Article IV consultation with Germany. Directors noted that profitability in the bank and life insurance sectors remains low and that restructuring efforts must be accelerated to durably strengthen resilience and reduce risks. They stressed the importance of continued supervisory attention to progress in implementing restructuring plans and reducing interest rate risk in banking and insurance.
The staff report highlights that completion of Basel III, as well as other recent regulatory changes, may have important implications for large German banks. After a long period of favorable economic conditions, banks’ internal risk models may underestimate risk-weights. The introduction of the 72.5% output floor is aimed to limit the effects of sharp re-assessments of risks on bank capital. As the use of internal models is more pervasive in large banks, this measure will affect mostly this group. In addition, the report highlighted that the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFiD II), which came into force in January 2018, aims to increase transparency and efficiency in financial trading, but may also add regulatory compliance costs in the larger banks. Furthermore, the 2017 minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) policy of EU sets targets that are binding only for larger/more complex banks in the Single Resolution Board remit, while smaller and medium-size institutions are not yet affected. Few banks are expected to face funding shortfalls to meet MREL target and subordination requirements are facilitated by recent changes to the German Banking Act.
In the banking sector, the regulatory capital ratio has increased, but the cost-to-income ratio and leverage remain high. Risk-weighted capital stood at comfortable levels, supported by favorable macroeconomic conditions and declining risk-weighted asset density, and is improving for all categories, except large banks. Non-performing loans (NPLs) continue to decline and provisioning for impaired shipping loans is leveling off. As noted in the 2016 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), international experience suggests that macro-prudential tools should be deployed early to be most effective. It is therefore important that the macro-prudential framework is sufficiently nimble such that instruments can be utilized preventively to avoid the build-up of vulnerabilities. The macro-prudential toolkit should be strengthened. New tools—loan to value (LTV) caps and amortization requirements—were legally created in 2017, a welcome development. However, income-based instruments, such as the debt-to-income ratio and the debt-service-to income ratio, are not included in the legislation. These tools, which can help prevent an excessive build-up of debt by households when house prices are rising rapidly, should be added.
Large German banks continue to underperform relative to the European peers. To keep up with cost-reduction targets, the German global systemically important bank (G-SIB) presented an updated restructuring strategy to refocus activities in Europe and reduce personnel costs by shrinking its investment banking business. Overall, the financial market stress is assessed to be low, capital buffers in the banking and life insurance sectors are deemed comfortable. Nevertheless, accelerating restructuring, restoring profitability, and reducing interest rate risk remain the key priorities in the banking and life insurance sectors. Continued supervisory attention to interest rate risk and implementation of restructuring plans, including through Pillar 2 measures, remains essential. The report also reveals that low interest rates and the introduction of Solvency II are forcing some restructuring in the life insurance sector. Solvency ratios, according to Solvency II, have improved overall, alongside the increase in long-term yields, since late 2016. However, a majority (nearly 70%) of life insurers rely on transitional measures to calculate their solvency capital requirement. As was noted in the Bundesbank’s 2017 Financial Stability Report, 14 life insurers would not meet the Solvency II minimum requirement as of end of 2016 without transition measures.
Related Link: Staff Report
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Solvency II, Basel III, MiFID II, NPLs, Restructuring, IMF
Previous ArticleSEC Adopts Changes to Public Liquidity Risk Management Disclosure
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.
EIOPA announced a change in the frequency of current extraordinary processes for risk-free interest rate term structures (RFR) and symmetric adjustment to equity risk (EDA) from a weekly basis to every two weeks.