PRA Proposes Simplified Obligations for Recovery Planning
PRA published the consultation paper CP10/20, with a proposal to allow certain firms to benefit from simplified obligations for recovery planning. This proposal is in light of the discretion PRA has under 4(1) of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive or BRRD (2014/59/EU) on whether to apply simplified obligations. The proposal involves changes to the supervisory statement SS9/17 on recovery planning and would reduce recovery planning expectations for certain firms. The comment period on CP10/20 closes on October 23, 2020. In the second half of 2020, PRA plans to publish the final policy statement and to notify the firms that are eligible for simplified obligations. Pending consideration of the responses to CP10/20, the amendments to SS9/17 would apply with immediate effect once the final policy statement is published.
The proposals in CP10/20 relate to how PRA would perform the eligibility assessment process to determine which firms are eligible for simplified obligations in respect of recovery planning. The proposals also address the recovery planning expectations for firms deemed eligible for simplified obligations. For firms that are eligible for simplified obligations, the proposals seek to reduce the minimum number of scenarios considered in recovery planning to two and clarify that these firms are not expected to submit the information recovery plan information template referred to in SS9/17. CP10/20 is relevant to PRA-authorized UK banks, building societies, designated UK investment firms, and their qualifying parent undertakings to which the Recovery Plans Part of the PRA Rulebook applies.
The proposals support the PRA approach to enhanced proportionality for smaller and non-systemic firms. PRA considers that the proposal introduces a more proportionate approach for recovery planning that would not cause firms to incur additional costs as a direct result of the proposals. The proposals set out in CP10/20 have been designed in the context of the withdrawal of UK from EU and entry into the transition period, during which time UK remains subject to the European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the proposals would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: October 23, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Securities, Recovery Planning, Basel, BRRD, CP10/20, SS9/17, Resolution Framework, Proportionality, PRA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
HKMA Issues Guidance on Implementing BCBS FAQs on Benchmark ReformsRelated Articles
EBA Sets Out Standards for Pillar 3 Disclosures of ESG Risks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft implementing technical standards on Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.
EBA Proposes Guidelines on Remuneration Benchmarking, High Earner Data
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed to update the guidelines on the data collection exercise on high earners and the remuneration benchmarking exercise under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
MAS Issues Updates on Its Activities: Ravi Menon Becomes NGFS Chair
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) announced the appointment of Mr. Ravi Menon, the Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), as its new Chair for a two-year term.
CBIRC Issues Rules on Related-Party Transactions and Outsourcing Risks
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules on related-party transactions and outsourcing risks.
OSFI Issues Results of Pilot on Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
EC Issues Regulation on Adjustments to K-Factor Coefficients Under IFR
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
BIS Tests CBDC with Banks; FIS Examines Tech Firm Licensing Regime
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) announced successful test integration of wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) settlement with commercial banks, as part of the Project Helvetia.
ECB Issues Opinions on Green Bonds Standard and CRR Proposals
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
ESRB Explores Policy Response to Risks Arising from Digitalization
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
HKMA Consults on FIRO Code, Revises Policy on Foreign Exchange Risk
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
