OSFI Updates Address BCAR Reporting, Basel Reforms, and Cyber Risk
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the 2023 Basel Capital Adequacy Reporting (BCAR) manual as well as the 2023 BCAR return. OSFI also published a series of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the implementation of Basel III banking reforms. Additionally, OSFI released the final Guideline B-13, which sets out its expectations for how federally regulated financial institutions should manage technology and cyber risks such as data breaches, technology outages, and more.
BCAR reporting manual and return. The BCAR reporting manual provides guidance on how to complete the full BCAR return. The BCAR return collects data to calculate the risk-based capital ratio of reporting institutions as well as details of the calculation. For domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs), this return also collects the data to calculate the risk-based Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) ratio of the reporting D-SIB, along with the details of the calculation. The return must be completed on a quarterly fiscal basis and filed within 30 days of the quarter-end date.
FAQs on Basel III Reforms. The FAQs offer guidance on certain aspects of the Basel III-related changes to the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, the Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guideline, and the Leverage Requirements Guideline. With respect to the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, OSFI has published FAQs on the risk-based capital targets, definition of capital, operational risk, standardized approach for credit risk, internal ratings-based approach to credit risk, settlement and counterparty risk, and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk. With respect to the Liquidity Adequacy Requirements Guideline, OSFI has published FAQs related to the liquidity coverage ratio and the net cumulative cash flow while, for the Leverage Requirements Guideline, OSFI has published FAQs related to the leverage ratio buffer.
Guideline on technology and cyber risk management. The guideline, which will be effective as of January 01, 2024, has been organized into three domains: governance and risk management, technology operations and resilience, and cyber-security. Each domain has a desired outcome for the federally regulated financial institutions to achieve through managing risks that contribute to developing their resilience to technology and cyber risks. The guideline sets out the following key principles under each domain:
- Senior Management should assign responsibility for managing technology and cyber risks to senior officers. It should also ensure an appropriate organizational structure and adequate resourcing are in place for managing technology and cyber risks across the federally regulated financial institution.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should define, document, approve, and implement a strategic technology and cyber plan(s). The plan(s) should align to business strategy and set goals and objectives that are measurable and evolve with changes in the federally regulated financial institution’s technology and cyber environment.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should establish a technology and cyber risk management framework. The framework should set out a risk appetite for technology and cyber risks and define federally regulated financial institution’s processes and requirements to identify, assess, manage, monitor, and report on technology and cyber risks.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should maintain an updated inventory of all technology assets supporting business processes or functions. Federally regulated financial institution’s asset management processes should address classification of assets to facilitate risk identification and assessment, record configurations to ensure asset integrity, provide for the safe disposal of assets at the end of their life cycle, and monitor and manage technology currency.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should establish and maintain an Enterprise Disaster Recovery Program (EDRP) to support its ability to deliver technology services through disruption and operate within its risk tolerance.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should maintain a range of practices, capabilities, processes and tools to identify and assess cyber security for weaknesses that could be exploited by external and insider threat actors.
- Federally regulated financial institutions should design, implement and maintain multi-layer, preventive cyber security controls and measures to safeguard its technology assets.
Related Links
- BCAR Reporting Manual
- BCAR 2023 Return (XLSX)
- FAQs on Basel III Reforms
- News Release on Guideline on Technology and Cyber Risk Management
- Guidelines on Technology and Cyber Risk Management
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel, BCAR, Reporting, Capital Adequacy, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Operational Risk, FAQ, Technology Risk, Cyber Risk, Regtech, CVA Risk, OSFI
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
CBIRC Issues Notice on Management of Online Lending for BanksNext Article
ECB Announces Croatia to Join Euro Area Next YearRelated Articles
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.