RBNZ is consulting on an issues paper on the review of the capital adequacy framework for registered banks. The consultation is on the type of financial instruments that qualify as bank capital. Important considerations for regulations about bank capital include the RBNZ's regulatory approach, the resolution regime, international standards issued by BCBS, the experience with the current capital regime of RBNZ, and the fact that dominant participants in the New Zealand banking market are subsidiaries of overseas banks. The consultation paper discusses these issues and outlines five options for reforming the existing regulations.
The paper is divided into two parts. Part A provides context for decisions about the regulatory definition of capital and Part B outlines the reform proposals. After outlining the different types of instruments that might constitute bank capital and focusing on a class of instruments known as contingent debt, Part A describes the context for New Zealand’s capital regulations and the country's experience under Basel III. The proposed reforms to capital regulations aim to reduce the complexity of the regulatory regime, provide greater certainty about the quality of capital that banks hold, and reduce the scope for regulatory arbitrage.
Comment Due Date: September 08, 2017
Keywords: Asia Pacific, RBNZ, New Zealand, Capital Adequacy Framework, Basel III, Banking
Previous ArticleOSFI Released Draft Guideline on TLAC for D-SIBs in Canada
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.