IMF published its staff report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with Slovak Republic. IMF Directors noted that the banking sector is stable and well-capitalized, but profitability is under pressure and segments of vulnerability exist. Proactive macro-prudential measures have moderated credit growth and reduced credit risks of new loans. The incremental use of countercyclical capital buffers (CCyB) and supervisory capital requirements have been appropriate in ensuring adequate capital buffers for banks. Strong vigilance of smaller banks, including through reduction of non-performing loans (NPLs), is important and further increase in capital buffers may be needed, given their higher vulnerability.
The staff report highlighted that the banking sector is stable but less systemic institutions are vulnerable to economic downturns. The overall capital levels are well above the regulatory minimum while the liquidity position remains comfortable, with most banks still largely relying on deposits for funding. The overall NPL ratio has declined to a post-crisis low of 3% at the end of 2018; however, less systemic banks and building societies show higher average NPL ratios as well as lower coverage ratios. The staff analysis shows that these institutions, which constitute roughly a fifth of banking sector assets, could lose all or a large part of the capital buffers if their NPL ratios double. Profitability has been robust but faces risks from compressed lending margins. Declining risk-weight estimates in the internal models and low credit risk spreads, reflecting historically low default rates on mortgages, have resulted in significant compression of lending margins in the mortgage market—the largest in the EU.
The report also mentions that the authorities’ proactive macro-prudential policy stance is welcome and could be strengthened as follows:
- Reduce NPLs of less systemic institutions. The authorities’ initiative to require banks with high NPL ratios to develop an NPL-reduction strategy is welcome and their efforts to reduce NPLs should be sustained. To contain credit risks, building societies should be required to increase the NPL coverage ratio. The recently introduced regulatory cap on the share of long-maturity loans in new loans extended by building societies should be complemented by a cap on the share of uncollateralized loans in total loans.
- Enhance capital buffers of weaker banks. The staff supported incremental use of CCyB and supervisory (Pillar II) capital requirements to enhance resilience of banks to shocks and the authorities’ readiness to further increase CCyB. In addition, considering the uneven asset quality across banks, the authorities should strongly consider imposing non-zero Pillar II capital guidance for less systemic institutions in 2019, taking into account the supervisory stress test results.
- Better internalize mortgage credit risks. The average risk-weights in the internal models of systemic foreign bank subsidiaries in Slovakia are lower than in most other EU peers, reflecting the historically low default rates. To discourage excessive risk-taking, the authorities should strongly consider introducing a risk-weight add-on on housing loans to require banks to better internalize credit risks, which can be complemented with a floor on risk-weights on housing loans.
Given the dominance of foreign banks in the Slovak banking system, strong home-host cooperation is critical. With limited domestic capacity to absorb bail-in-able bonds, encouraging banks to have higher non-regulatory capital buffers may also help them meet minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). To fill the gaps identified at the European level regulations by the recent euro area Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), the domestic regulatory regime should require banks to obtain authorities’ pre-approval in acquiring qualifying holdings of non-bank entities and to periodically report the ultimate beneficial owners of their qualifying holdings.
Related Link: Staff Report
Keywords: Europe, Slovak Republic, Banking, Securities, Article IV, FAP, CCyB, NPLs, Macro-Prudential Policy, MREL, Credit Risk, Pillar 2, Capital Requirements, IMF
Previous ArticleHKMA Revises Implementation Schedule for Initial Margin Rules
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting