EBA finalized the guidelines on treatment of structural foreign-exchange (FX) positions under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines consider changes to the market risk framework introduced in CRR2 and the structural foreign-exchange treatment envisaged in the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) standards. Thus, the guidelines have been designed in such a way that institutions will not be required to ask for a new permission once they switch to the FRTB framework for computing the own funds requirements for market risk. The guidelines will be applicable from January 01, 2022, one year later than originally envisaged to ensure that institutions have time to prepare for the introduction of the requirements.
The guidelines are deemed to set objective criteria that competent authorities should consider for assessing whether the conditions set out in Article 352(2) of CRR for receiving the permission to exclude a foreign-exchange position from the net open position in the foreign currency are met. To harmonize such practices among EU jurisdictions, several technical details have been included as part of these guidelines, which:
- Provide some clarifications about the structural foreign exchange provision. It is clarified that institutions computing the own funds requirements for foreign exchange risk both using the standardized approach and using the internal model approach may apply for the waiver. The waiver should be sought only for currencies that are relevant to the institution
- Discuss the concepts of positions "deliberately taken to hedge the capital ratio" and positions of "a non-trading or structural nature." The guidelines set out that only banking book positions may be subject to the waiver (on meeting other conditions) and that the position for which the exemption is sought should be long on a net basis.
- Lay down the governance requirements and the requirements related to the risk management strategy of the institution with respect to the structural foreign-exchange positions.
- Deal with the treatment of items held at historical cost. EBA clarified that such items should be considered part of the foreign-exchange open position.
- Deal with the calculation of the maximum open position that can be excluded from the net open position. In line with the FRTB standards, EBA clarifies that the exemption should be limited in size by the open position for which the capital ratio is non-sensitive to the exchange rate.
- Clarify certain aspects of the calculation of the own funds requirements for foreign-exchange risk, where some positions have been excluded from the net open position following the permission of the competent authority.
- Provide clarifications about the approval process and how competent authorities should react to possible changes in the risk management strategy of structural foreign exchange positions.
The two annexes to the guidelines further clarify certain technical details discussed in the guidelines and provide examples on application of the structural foreign-exchange provision. These guidelines are based on a consultation paper that EBA had published on October 16, 2019. Twenty-one respondents provided feedback on the consultation paper. However, only six of the responses were non-confidential and were published on the EBA website. A summary of the non-confidential responses, along with EBA analyses of those responses, has been included in the guidelines. EBA considered the feedback provided by all respondents in developing the final guidelines.
Effective Date: January 01, 2022
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, CRR2, Structural Foreign Exchange, FRTB, Market Risk, Regulatory Capital, Basel, EBA
Previous ArticleMFSA Updates Guidelines on Supervisory Reporting Requirements
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.