In a letter to the FED Governors, the U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown, who is a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, called on the FED to use its prudential authorities, including the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for the biggest banks, to strengthen the resilience of the financial system and protect against the next economic downturn. Referring to the fact that the largest banks in the U.S. reported record profits to the tune of USD 100 billion, Senator Brown highlighted that the "systemic vulnerabilities are becoming more apparent."
He mentioned that now is the time to require additional capital buffers that large banks could draw on to mitigate a large adverse financial shock. The FED last considered the CCyB requirements in December 2017 and, at that time, voted to leave it at 0%. According to the FED, “circumstances in which the Board would most likely use the CCyB … would be to address circumstances when systemic vulnerabilities are somewhat above normal.” Under the policy statement, FED will consider a number of financial system vulnerabilities, including asset valuation pressures and risk appetite and leverage in the nonfinancial sector. These systemic vulnerabilities are becoming more apparent. The letter also mentioned that, recently, the former FED Chair Yellen urged FED "to carefully consider raising the CCyB at this time.” She noted elevated asset valuations in the real estate sector, the large volume of leveraged lending with a significant weakening of underwriting standards, and the high debt burdens of nonfinancial companies as threats to economic stability during the next downturn.
Senator Brown also cited the credit rating agency Moody’s Investor Service, stating that weak lending practices and increased lending to lower quality corporate borrowers “are creating credit risks that portend an extended and meaningful default cycle once the current expansion ends.” and that "Moody’s envisions more defaults than the last downturn and lower recoveries." According to Senator Brown, while capital quality and levels have increased since the crisis, capital levels are below the optimal amount needed to insulate American taxpayers from future bailouts. A comprehensive examination by FED economists found that current Basel capital surcharges for global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) are less than half the size than would be economically justified by an “expected impact” framework based on the economic effect of large bank failure. The same study also suggests that U.S. large bank surcharges currently set by FED, while larger than the Basel surcharges, are likely still considerably lower than the economically optimal level. "Instead of increasing capital, it appears the FED is heading in the wrong direction as it has started to take steps to reduce certain capital requirements."
Related Link: Press Release and Letter
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Systemic Risk, G-SIB, CCyB, Capital Buffer, FED, US Senate Committee
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleOCC Updates “Other Real Estate Owned” Part of Comptroller’s Handbook
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.