Featured Product

    Ignazio Angeloni of ECB on Proportionality in Banking Supervision

    February 28, 2018

    Ignazio Angeloni, Member of the ECB Supervisory Board, suggested taking another look at proportionality in banking supervision, at the Thirteenth Asia-Pacific High Level Meeting on Banking Supervision in Singapore. During his speech, he examined how proportionality principle is translated into legal and regulatory framework; what does European Banking Supervision do to conform to that principle; and what are the challenges one faces and the limits one must respect in applying proportionality in supervision.

    He outlined the work and guidelines in this area, both at the international (by BCBS and BIS) and the EU level (via Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive—CRR and CRD IV). He also discussed the areas of Single Supervisory mechanism (SSM) where proportionality applies. These areas relate to significant banks, for whom reporting requirements and fees already differ; less significant banks, for whom the scope and frequency of information requests for reporting requirements depends on the nature of the entity concerned; and the less significant banks that are prioritized into High, Medium, and Low priority entities. Next, he mentioned some initiatives under discussion at the international and European levels to enhance proportionality in banking supervision. Within BCBS, simpler approaches for calculating capital requirements (for example, credit risk, operational risk, credit valuation adjustment risk) have been developed. At the EU level, in the ongoing review of the CRR and CRD IV, EC has proposed simplified market and counterparty credit risk measures for smaller institutions as well as reductions in the frequency and scope of supervisory data reporting and disclosure.

    Mr. Angeloni stated: "ECB does not support lowering the reporting frequency for such entities. Frequent reporting is a key source of information for supervisors, especially in relation to smaller institutions, which do not undergo sufficient market scrutiny. Early warning systems are effective only if data are sufficiently frequent. Another challenge stems from setting the thresholds to categorize institutions, because quantitative thresholds are difficult to apply and at the margin may create cliff effects and distortions." He then discussed the challenges and limits of proportionality in banking supervision. Although smaller banks transmit little or no risk to the system, this does not imply that they are individually less risky. He added that, in both US and EU, the number of bank failures has been much higher in less significant than in significant banks, both in absolute terms and in relative terms. Thus, he argued that prudential soundness must remain the overarching principle, regardless of size. Additionally, small banks promote diversification in the banking system; hence, reducing concentration and correlation, if they act independently from each other. However, especially in Europe small institutions are often part of larger groups or associations (such as institutional protection schemes), which reduces the benefit from diversification. The tendency to aggregate in groups or protection schemes clearly confirms the existence of powerful economies of scale and scope.

    Finally, he discussed the potential social role of small banks. Small and cooperative banks are still widely recognized as having a social role by granting access to finance, or the provision of other social benefits, particularly in certain areas and for specific population groups. In Europe especially, savings and cooperative banks maintain a strong historical and cultural rooting. However, most of the cooperative sector has moved away from its original social and charitable function and, today, performs standard banking business, providing services indistinguishable from those of its competitors. There may be cases justifying a support to smaller banks that provide financial services where other banks are less present, but there seems to be no compelling reason why such support should be embedded in the prudential framework, added Mr. Angeloni. He concluded that proportionality should not lead to supervisory laxity or deviations from the single rule book. "Arguments and evidence do not support, on balance, a more favorable treatment to small banks by the micro-prudential regulator or supervisor. If deemed justified, for example for social reasons, such support should be provided otherwise. In SSM, prudential soundness, harmonization, and competitive level-playing field have been and should remain the overarching guiding principles," according to Mr. Angeloni.


    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Proportionality, SSM, Basel III, ECB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA on Fintech Adoption and Innovation by Banks in Hong Kong

    HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS on Impact of Increasing Use of Cloud Technology on Cyber Risk

    BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Consults on Guide for Managing Climate and Environmental Risks

    ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Issues Opinion on Revisions to CRR in Response to COVID Crisis

    ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Assesses Interlinkages Between Recovery and Resolution Planning

    EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Publishes Final MREL Policy Under the Banking Package

    SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.

    May 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Amend Interim Final Rule on Transition Period for CECL

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.

    May 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Releases Results of March Survey on Credit Terms and Conditions

    ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.

    May 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FINMA Adjusts Deadlines for COVID-19 Relief Measures for Banks

    FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.

    May 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Consults on Standardized Data Set for Bank Valuation in Resolution

    SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.

    May 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5203