Featured Product

    Ignazio Angeloni of ECB on Proportionality in Banking Supervision

    February 28, 2018

    Ignazio Angeloni, Member of the ECB Supervisory Board, suggested taking another look at proportionality in banking supervision, at the Thirteenth Asia-Pacific High Level Meeting on Banking Supervision in Singapore. During his speech, he examined how proportionality principle is translated into legal and regulatory framework; what does European Banking Supervision do to conform to that principle; and what are the challenges one faces and the limits one must respect in applying proportionality in supervision.

    He outlined the work and guidelines in this area, both at the international (by BCBS and BIS) and the EU level (via Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive—CRR and CRD IV). He also discussed the areas of Single Supervisory mechanism (SSM) where proportionality applies. These areas relate to significant banks, for whom reporting requirements and fees already differ; less significant banks, for whom the scope and frequency of information requests for reporting requirements depends on the nature of the entity concerned; and the less significant banks that are prioritized into High, Medium, and Low priority entities. Next, he mentioned some initiatives under discussion at the international and European levels to enhance proportionality in banking supervision. Within BCBS, simpler approaches for calculating capital requirements (for example, credit risk, operational risk, credit valuation adjustment risk) have been developed. At the EU level, in the ongoing review of the CRR and CRD IV, EC has proposed simplified market and counterparty credit risk measures for smaller institutions as well as reductions in the frequency and scope of supervisory data reporting and disclosure.

    Mr. Angeloni stated: "ECB does not support lowering the reporting frequency for such entities. Frequent reporting is a key source of information for supervisors, especially in relation to smaller institutions, which do not undergo sufficient market scrutiny. Early warning systems are effective only if data are sufficiently frequent. Another challenge stems from setting the thresholds to categorize institutions, because quantitative thresholds are difficult to apply and at the margin may create cliff effects and distortions." He then discussed the challenges and limits of proportionality in banking supervision. Although smaller banks transmit little or no risk to the system, this does not imply that they are individually less risky. He added that, in both US and EU, the number of bank failures has been much higher in less significant than in significant banks, both in absolute terms and in relative terms. Thus, he argued that prudential soundness must remain the overarching principle, regardless of size. Additionally, small banks promote diversification in the banking system; hence, reducing concentration and correlation, if they act independently from each other. However, especially in Europe small institutions are often part of larger groups or associations (such as institutional protection schemes), which reduces the benefit from diversification. The tendency to aggregate in groups or protection schemes clearly confirms the existence of powerful economies of scale and scope.

    Finally, he discussed the potential social role of small banks. Small and cooperative banks are still widely recognized as having a social role by granting access to finance, or the provision of other social benefits, particularly in certain areas and for specific population groups. In Europe especially, savings and cooperative banks maintain a strong historical and cultural rooting. However, most of the cooperative sector has moved away from its original social and charitable function and, today, performs standard banking business, providing services indistinguishable from those of its competitors. There may be cases justifying a support to smaller banks that provide financial services where other banks are less present, but there seems to be no compelling reason why such support should be embedded in the prudential framework, added Mr. Angeloni. He concluded that proportionality should not lead to supervisory laxity or deviations from the single rule book. "Arguments and evidence do not support, on balance, a more favorable treatment to small banks by the micro-prudential regulator or supervisor. If deemed justified, for example for social reasons, such support should be provided otherwise. In SSM, prudential soundness, harmonization, and competitive level-playing field have been and should remain the overarching guiding principles," according to Mr. Angeloni.


    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Banking Supervision, Proportionality, SSM, Basel III, ECB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    ECB Allows Temporary Relief in Leverage Ratio Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

    ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Launch Survey on Templates for Product Disclosures Under SFDR

    ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Proposes Integrated Reporting Framework to Reduce Burden for Banks

    ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.

    September 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Finalizes Methodology to Assess CCR and A-CVA Risk of Banks

    ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Opinion on Definition of Credit Institution in CRR

    EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).

    September 18, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Consults on Alignment of Daily Liquidity Report for Banks

    APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Releases Scenarios for Second Round of Stress Tests on Banks

    FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED to Temporarily Revise FR Y-14 Reports to Conduct Stressed Analysis

    FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Revises Information Collection Under Market Risk Capital Rule

    FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Seeks Input on ESG Disclosure Practices of Banks

    EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.

    September 17, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5809