IAIS and Sustainable Insurance Forum (SIF) published an issues paper on implementation of the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). Recognizing the diversity of supervisory frameworks across jurisdictions, the paper identifies a number of areas in which supervisors can encourage strengthened disclosures through the application of existing supervisory tools. To support supervisory efforts to assess the impact of climate-related risks to the insurance sector and help resolve challenges, including around public disclosures, IAIS and SIF will further work on climate-related risks in the insurance sector during 2020; the work will be focused on topics such as enterprise risk management, corporate governance, investment, and disclosures. Additionally, IAIS published a Peer Review Process (PRP) Questionnaire related to the Insurance Core Principle (ICP) 19 on conduct of business.
In June 2018, IAIS and SIF released a joint issues paper on climate change risks to the insurance sector. As a follow-up to the 2018 issues paper and recognizing the important role of the TCFD Recommendations in establishing a framework for climate-related disclosures for the insurance sector, IAIS and SIF agreed to develop this second issues paper. This paper provides an overview of practices that supervisors have considered in the development of climate-related disclosure requirements within their markets. Considering the diversity of supervisory frameworks across jurisdictions, this paper focuses on practices that can be implemented with limited direct regulatory intervention. The paper draws on the results of a SIF survey on implementation of the TCFD recommendations and supplemental guidance, which was conducted during the first half of 2019. Case studies submitted by SIF members support the formulation of options for supervisors that are included in Annex 1.
Going forward, supervisors may seek to consider a range of broader issues stemming from increased climate risk as they may be relevant for supervisory objectives, including the following issues:
- The potential for increasing climate risk to affect insurance pricing for vulnerable consumers—Supervisors could consider how to use TCFD-aligned disclosures as a springboard to explore how insurance sector climate risk intelligence can be used to strengthen government and consumer awareness, incentivize mitigation actions, and ultimately reduce exposures.
- Implications of climate risks for long-term business model resilience—Strengthening climate risk transparency, including forward-looking scenario analysis, could illuminate the ways in which climate risks may impact insurance business model viability over the long-term.
- Interactions between micro- and macro-prudential objectives—In the case of integrated supervisory authorities, strengthening climate risk transparency may have implications for a range of institutional objectives. Integrated frameworks, linking firm-level disclosures to system-level assessments, could help strengthen understanding of the impact of climate risks on individual firms as well as the impact of the sector as a whole on climate risk resilience within the financial system and broader economy.
The IAIS and SIF recognize the value of developing further material to support supervisors in their efforts to assess climate risks, including in relation to the ICPs. The second issues paper is a step toward this objective and is intended to lay the groundwork for development of future work, such as an IAIS Application Paper.
Keywords: International, Insurance, TCFD, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Sustainable Insurance Forum, Climate Change Risk, Disclosures, IAIS
Previous ArticleECB Announces Cyber Information and Intelligence Sharing Initiative
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.