Featured Product

    Dietrich Domanski of FSB Speaks at Conference on CCP Risk Management

    February 27, 2019

    The FSB Secretary General Dietrich Domanski spoke, at a conference, about the management of central counterparty (CCP) risk. With respect to the CCP reforms, he discussed the work done so far and the work that remains to be done from the perspective of FSB. In terms of the remaining work, he covered areas of policy development as well as the implementation and evaluation of the existing standards. According to him, more work is needed to ensure adequacy of financial resources and treatment of CCP equity in resolution, to complete the adoption of central clearing frameworks, and to understand the effects of reforms on central clearing.

    Mr. Domanski highlighted that CCP resolution continues to be a challenging topic, with complex debates around issues such as the use of variation margin gains haircutting, resources and responsibility for non-default losses, and the boundary between recovery and resolution. In November 2018, FSB had published a discussion paper, jointly with CPMI and IOSCO, on financial resources to support CCP resolution and the treatment of equity in CCP resolution. Responses to the public consultation, along with the experience of authorities in evaluating financial resources for resolution, will help inform the development of guidance by the end of 2020. He mentioned that next steps need to be based on the responses received. Mr. Domanski also noted the continued progress toward enhancing the regulatory frameworks for CCPs, including in cross-border aspects such as deference decisions in relation to CCPs, and in setting expectations for their sound design and operations (consistent with PFMI by CPMI and IOSCO). He also emphasized that more work is needed across the FSB membership to implement requirements on recovery and resolution. In Europe, EC, as a member of FSB, and the European Parliamentarians have shown a clear desire to implement the international standards while some other jurisdictions do not yet have in place a comprehensive resolution regime for CCPs.

    He added that the Crisis Management Groups (CMGs) are a key component in ensuring that appropriate resolution arrangements are in place, given the cross-border activities of many CCPs. Authorities have begun to establish CMGs for CCPs that have been identified as systemically important in more than one jurisdiction. CMGs and institution-specific cooperation agreements that underpin their operation are not yet in place for all such CCPs and resolution planning for CCPs is still at an early stage. For CCPs that are systemically important in more than one jurisdiction, resolution plans should be developed by the home resolution authority and coordinated within CMG or equivalent arrangements. Rapid progress in implementation is important. A lack of effective and timely implementation of the guidance on CCP resilience, recovery, and resolution would considerably limit the toolkit that supervisors have to address CCP risks.

    The evaluation of the effects of reforms is a new, key area of FSB work. One of the first two evaluations under FSB framework was on the incentives to centrally clear derivatives. The evaluation found that including client margins in the leverage ratio creates a disincentive for central clearing. BCBS has been consulting on the question of whether, and how, there is a case for changing the treatment of client margins in the leverage ratio in light of this finding. Furthermore, CCPs will play a role in another evaluation by FSB. This evaluation will examine the effects of too-big-to-fail reforms for banks. Notwithstanding the focus on banks, the evaluation will consider implications for CCPs, keeping in mind that global systemically important banks are the largest clearing members and key nodes in an interconnected financial system. This evaluation should be completed by late 2020. Finally, he discussed the initiative (a priority under Japan’s G20 Presidency in 2019) on exploring the causes and financial stability implications of market fragmentation, along with the possible policy approaches to address possible unintended effects. 

     

    Related Link: Speech (PDF)

     

    Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, CCP, Resolution Planning, Recovery and Resolution, Post Crisis Reforms, CCP Resolution, Too Big to Fail, FSB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BaFin Publishes Submission Deadlines Under Solvency II

    BaFin published quarterly and annual submission deadlines on the Solvency II reporting page on its website.

    February 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    RBNZ to Address Cyber Risk Through Risk Management Guidance

    RBNZ announced that it is strengthening its efforts to enhance resilience of the financial system from cyber threats, including developing risk management guidance and promoting information-sharing in collaboration with industry and other public organizations.

    February 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSI Convened Meeting on Climate Risk Assessment in Financial Sector

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS issued a summary of the meeting held in Basel from February 20-21, 2020.

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Updates Basel III Monitoring Workbook in February 2020

    BCBS updated the workbook for Basel III monitoring to version 4.1.2, for the collection of December 2019 data.

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Bank of Finland Updates Validation Checks for AnaCredit Reporting

    Bank of Finland published Version 1.8 of the validation checks for credit data collection under the AnaCredit Regulation.

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Plans to Assess Climate Risks and Develop Prudential Guidance

    APRA published a letter that outlines its plans to undertake a climate change vulnerability assessment and develop a prudential practice guide focused on climate-related financial risks.

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FDIC Publishes Guide to Help with Third-Party Risk Management

    The technology lab of FDIC (FDiTech) published a new guide to help financial technology, or fintech, companies and others partner with banks.

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Removes References to LIBOR in SoP on Pillar 2 Capital and SS20/15

    PRA published a policy statement (PS3/20) that provides updates to certain supervisory statements (SS20/15, SS28/15, and SS35/15) and statements of policy (SoP).

    February 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA to Transition to Annual Stress Testing of Large Banks in 2020

    APRA published key findings of the stress testing assessment conducted on authorized deposit-taking institutions.

    February 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Updates Version 1.1.0 of Taxonomy for Form AS and Form FV

    BoE published the statistical notice 2020/01 that provides an update to Version 1.1.0 of the taxonomy for forms AS (MFI holdings of securities collection) and FV (Financial Vehicle Corporations return) and the associated validation rules.

    February 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4729